Friday, August 27, 2010

Cardinal Keith O'Brien
LONDON, 26 Aug – Baha’is in Scotland and throughout the UK have welcomed a statement issued by Cardinal Keith O’Brien, Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh and head of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Scotland.
Cardinal O’Brien strongly condemns the unjust imprisonment of seven leaders of the Baha’i community in Iran. His statement reads:
Having been united in prayer with seven Baha’i Leaders, who were arrested more than two years ago in Iran, I deeply regret the news that these leaders have now been sentenced to 20 years imprisonment.
I am happy to join in the recent statement issued by William Hague MP, Foreign Secretary, on this matter and regard what has happened as being a most appalling transgression of justice and at heart a gross violation of the human right of freedom of belief.
Unfortunately, I myself cannot be at the forthcoming vigil of protest on Saturday 28 August 2010 by the St Mungo Museum in Cathedral Square, Glasgow, but I unite myself in prayer for those of the Baha’i faith who are suffering at this present time in Iran and also to the many other peoples of goodwill who are suffering for their faiths in other parts of the world.
+ Keith Patrick Cardinal O’Brien
Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh
“We are grateful that Cardinal O’Brien has once again spoken out in defence of the Baha’is in Iran,” said Allan Forsyth of the Baha’i Council for Scotland. “We are heartened that leaders of Scotland’s faith communities are so willing to demonstrate inter-faith solidarity and support in times of stress.”

Thursday, August 26, 2010


"My feet were swollen from lashes." Section 209 Episode 2



Global support intensifies for Iran's seven Baha'i leaders

GENEVA, 26 August (BWNS) – An increasing number of governments, human rights groups and prominent individuals are raising their voices against the harsh prison sentences handed down earlier this month to Iran's seven Baha'i leaders.

As lawyers for the prisoners prepare to appeal against the 20-year jail terms, the government of New Zealand has voiced its concern that the trial "was conducted in a manner that was neither fair nor transparent."

"New Zealand is dismayed that Iran has failed to uphold its international human rights commitments, and its own due legal processes in this case," said Foreign Minister Murray McCully.

"The sentences appear to be based wholly on the fact that these people are members of a minority religious group," said Mr. McCully, in a statement issued on 20 August.

"New Zealand calls on the Government of Iran to protect the fundamental rights of all its citizens, and to end its ongoing and systematic persecution of the Baha'i," he said.

The governments of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States of America - as well as the European Union and the President of the European Parliament - have already condemned the sentencing of the seven.

In the wake of calls from numerous international organizations for the prisoners to be released, groups focused specifically on human rights abuses in Iran –  such as the Human Rights Activists News Agency and United4Iran – as well as Amnesty International, have now launched letter-writing campaigns encouraging supporters to call for justice for the seven. Prominent individuals, including British barrister Cherie Blair, have also been raising their voices in support of the Baha'i leaders.

Minority Rights Group International (MRG) - which campaigns on behalf of disadvantaged minorities and indigenous peoples - has expressed it deep concern over the lengthy sentences.

"Given that independent observers were not allowed to attend the trial, and the history of persecution that the Baha'i community has faced in Iran, the outcome will do nothing to encourage faith in the Iranian justice system," said Carl Soderbergh, MRG's Director of Policy and Communications.

"MRG calls on Iran to quash the convictions and release the defendants immediately," Mr. Soderbergh added.


Human rights campaigns

Before their arrest in 2008, the seven prisoners were all members of a national-level group known as the "Yaran" –  or "Friends" –  that helped to see to the minimum needs of Iran's 300,000-strong Baha'i community.

Among the human rights groups now calling for justice for the seven, the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) is asking people throughout the world to join a "We are Yaran" campaign of letter writing.

The HRANA draft letter states: "There is no evidence in support of the charges leveled against these Baha'is, and the ultimate judgment of imprisonment is unjust and insupportable."

United4Iran –  a non-partisan global network promoting fundamental human and civil rights in Iran – is requesting that visitors to its website call attention to the plight of the prisoners, by sending email letters to world leaders and Iranian officials.

"Considering the advanced ages of several of these spiritual leaders, the IRI (Islamic Republic of Iran) has effectively dealt life sentences," says the group. A spokesperson for United4Iran said that, as of Wednesday, more than 1100 messages had been sent via the website link.

In the United States, Amnesty International is urging its members to write to the head of Iran's judiciary to protest the trial and sentencing.


Prominent individuals speak out

Noted British barrister Cherie Blair described the legal proceedings against the seven as a "sham trial" in an article published on Wednesday by The Guardian newspaper in the UK.

"During two years of incarceration, lawyers working with [Nobel laureate Shirin] Ebadi were granted less than two hours with their clients," wrote Ms. Blair. "They had only a few hours to examine the case files, comprising hundreds of pages. In the little time they were granted, they discovered the files were compiled by officials from the ministry of intelligence, despite Iranian law stipulating that such agents 'should not be entrusted with the investigation ... of the accused.'

"The catch-all charge of espionage exposes the reality behind the regime's cruel behaviour. Over the years, Baha'is have found themselves accused of being tools of Russian imperialism, British colonialism, American expansionism and most recently Zionism.

"But when we learn that Baha'is accused of spying for Israel are offered exoneration and the restoration of all the rights of citizenship if they will simply recant their faith, we can see such charges are totally baseless.

"The desecration of Baha'i cemeteries, the demolition of shrines and confiscation of Baha'i property are unlikely punishments for a band of spies.

"The truth behind this sentence is that it is an attempt to decapitate Iran's 300,000 strong Baha'i community. As members of Iran's biggest religious minority, they have suffered decades of discrimination, harassment and appalling treatment. Most recently, 50 Baha'i homes were razed in northern Iran, and we know of at least 47 other Baha'is currently imprisoned," wrote Ms. Blair.

The leader of the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland, the Archbishop of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, today called the 20-year jail terms for the Baha'i leaders "a most appalling transgression of justice and at heart a gross violation of the human right of freedom of belief."

"I unite myself in prayer for those of the Baha'i Faith who are suffering at this present time in Iran and also to the many other peoples of goodwill who are suffering for their faiths in other parts of the world," said Cardinal Keith Patrick O'Brien.

In a video statement posted on YouTube, the actor and comedian Omid Djalili said he was "very upset" by news of the prison sentences.

"The Baha'i Faith is a peaceful religion with a world embracing vision of unity for all people, of all faiths. It is a staunch defender of human rights. So the fact that these seven are held in prison as if they are perpetrators of the most heinous crimes is just ridiculous," said Mr. Djalili, whose clip received more than 8,000 views in its first few days.


"International outcry will continue"

The prisoners –  Fariba Kamalabadi, Jamaloddin Khanjani, Afif Naeimi, Saeid Rezaie, Mahvash Sabet, Behrouz Tavakkoli, and Vahid Tizfahm – denied all the allegations made against them which included espionage, propaganda against the Islamic republic and the establishment of an illegal administration. They are now incarcerated in Gohardasht prison in Karaj, some 20 kilometers west of Tehran.

"By all accounts, the charges against them were utterly baseless, and the trial itself was nothing but a charade," said Diane Ala'i, representative of the Baha'i International Community to the United Nations in Geneva.

"For as long as they are held in prison, this international outcry will continue," said Ms. Alai.



To read the article online and view images and links, go to:
http://news.bahai.org/story/790

For the Baha'i World News Service home page, go to:
http://news.bahai.org/

Wednesday, August 25, 2010


Iran is attempting to decapitate its Bahá'í community

The sham trial of seven Bahá'í leaders is a violation of Iran's international human rights obligations and the country's own law
When a mother of two can be sentenced to death by stoning on the basis of a disputed confession of adultery and without proper legal representation, there is little reason for faith in the fairness or mercy of Iran's judicial system. But as in the appalling case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, the 20-year jail sentences just handed out toseven Bahá'í leaders must provoke an international outcry in the hope that the Iranian government can be shamed into thinking again.
The sentences follow a sham trial in which the accused faced a variety of charges ranging from spreading propaganda against the state and engaging in espionage, to conspiring to commit offences against national security. Unless international pressure can force a change of mind, many of the Bahá'í leaders are doomed to die in prison. The oldest – Jamaloddin Khanjani – is already 77 years old.
Their former lawyer, the Nobel peace prizewinner Shirin Ebadi, who has herself been forced into exile because of her outspoken criticism of the Iranian regime's record on human rights, has said that there is no evidence to support the charges or claims of the prosecutor. What is also clear is that the trial comes after over two years of harsh and illegal detention and unfair treatment which violated not just international norms but also Iranian law.
The five men and two women had already spent eight months in jail before they were charged with any offence. Though Iranian law grants the accused the right to have a lawyer present during the investigation, this right was denied the prisoners.
During two years of incarceration, lawyers working with Ebadi were granted less than two hours with their clients. They had only a few hours to examine the case files, comprising hundreds of pages. In the little time they were granted, they discovered the files were compiled by officials from the ministry of intelligence, despite Iranian law stipulating that such agents "should not be entrusted with the investigation ... of the accused".
The catch-all charge of espionage exposes the reality behind the regime's cruel behaviour. Over the years, Bahá'ís have found themselves accused of being tools of Russian imperialism, British colonialism, American expansionism and most recently Zionism.
But when we learn that Bahá'ís accused of spying for Israel are offered exoneration and the restoration of all the rights of citizenship if they will simply recant their faith, we can see such charges are totally baseless.
The desecration of Bahá'í cemeteries, the demolition of shrines and confiscation of Bahá'í property are unlikely punishments for a band of spies.
The truth behind this sentence is that it is an attempt to decapitate Iran's 300,000 strong Bahá'í community. As members of Iran's biggest religious minority, they have suffered decades of discrimination, harassment and appalling treatment. Most recently, 50 Bahá'í homes were razed in northern Iran, and we know of at least 47 other Bahá'ís currently imprisoned.
Yet the Bahá'í faith, which has its roots in Iran, is a gentle religion which emphasises the spiritual unity of all humankind and builds on the prophets of many faiths, including Jesus and Mohammed. It poses no threat to the Iranian regime. The peaceful, constructive lives led by millions of Bahá'ís in other countries contradict the fears of the Iranian regime. Iran's disregard for its own laws, let alone its human rights obligations, exposes its religious fanaticism.
The foreign secretary, William Hague, has already said he was "appalled" at this "shocking example of the Iranian state's continued discrimination against the Bahá'ís". The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, called the sentence a "violation" of Iran's international obligations. Australia, Canada, the European parliament and European Commission, France, Germany and the Netherlands have expressed their concern as have, among others, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.
A chorus of condemnation is reminding Iran that it signed and ratified the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, in which Article 18 upholds the right to adopt and practice a religion or belief. The Iranian authorities, despite what they pretend, are not deaf to international criticism. We must all add our voices on this latest abandonment of Iran's human rights obligations so the regime hears us loud and clear.

Seven Baha’i Leaders Given Harsh Prison Sentence
Posted: 24 Aug 2010 10:22 AM PDT
Amnesty International USA
Amnesty International USA
Seven leaders of Iran’s Baha’i community were sentenced to twenty years in prison by a Revolutionary Court in Tehran on 7 August 2010. Although they have done nothing more than peacefully practice their religion, they were convicted on serious, but baseless, charges including “espionage for Israel,” “insulting religious sanctities” and “propaganda against the system.” They had
Yaran: Seven Baha'i leaders who have been in prison in Tehran.
Yaran: Seven Baha'i leaders who have been in prison in Tehran.
also been charged with “ifsad fil arz” or “corruption on earth.” All seven are held in Section 209 of Evin Prison in Tehran [IPW Editor: since the sentencing, they were moved to Gohardast prison], which is run by the Ministry of Intelligence. They have only been allowed intermittent access to their lawyers while they have been in custody.
The seven detained Baha’is include two women, Fariba Kamalabadi (age 47, a developmental psychologist and mother of three) and Mahvash Sabet (age 57, teacher), and five men: Jamaloddin Khanjani (age 76), Afif Naeimi (age 48, factory owner), Saeid Rezaei (age 52, agricultural engineer), Behrouz Tavakkoli (age 58, carpentry shop owner, former social worker) and Vahid Tizfahm (age 37, optometrist). All are leading members of a group responsible for the Baha’i community’s religious and administrative affairs. Mahvash Sabet who acted as the group’s secretary, was arrested on March 5 2008. The others were arrested on May 14 2008.
The seven Baha’i leaders have reportedly been held in poor conditions, in small cells without proper bedding. They have been permitted only limited access to their families. Fariba Kamalabadi and Mahvash Sabet were held in solitary confinement for the first few months of their imprisonment.
One of the Baha’is’ lawyers, Abdolfattah Soltani, was himself arrested in June in the crackdown following the disputed June 12, 2009 presidential elections and detained for more than two months. He is a member of the Center for Human Rights defenders, founded by Iran’s Nobel Laureate Shirin Ebadi, which was forcibly shut down by authorities in December 2008.
The detention and prosecution of the seven Baha’i leaders is part of the Iranian authorities’ wide-spread crackdown over the last several years on civil society in Iran, targeting students, journalists, labor activists, women’s activists and academics who have been exercising their rights to peacefully express their opinions. This right and the right to freedom of religion are recognized in international human rights treaties, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Take Action:
Ayatollah Sadeqh Larijani
Head of the Judiciary
Howzeh Riyasat-e Qoveh Qazaiyeh
(Office of the Head of the Judiciary)
Pasteur St., Vali Asr Ave., south of Serah-e Jomhouri, Tehran, 1316814737
Islamic Republic of Iran
Email: Via website: http://www.dadiran.ir/tabid/75/Default.aspx
First starred box: your given name; second starred box: your family name; third: your email address
box: your given name; second: your family name; third: your
email address

Dear Your Excellency:
I am writing to you to express my concern about the case of seven leaders of Iran’s Baha’i community who were sentenced to twenty years in prison on 7 August 2010. The seven detained Baha’is include two women, Fariba Kamalabadi and Mahvash Sabet and five men: Jamaloddin Khanjani, Afif Naeimi, Saeid Rezaei, Behrouz Tavakkoli, and Vahid Tizfahm. All are leading members of a group responsible for the Baha’i community’s religious and administrative affairs. Mahvash Sabet who acted as the group’s secretary, was arrested on March 5 2008. The others were arrested on May 14 2008. Although they have done nothing more than peacefully practice their religion, they were convicted on serious, but baseless, charges including “espionage for Israel,” “insulting religious sanctities” and “propaganda against the system.”
I urge that while in detention, the seven Baha’is be given access to their families, to their lawyers, and to any necessary medical attention. Furthermore, the seven Baha’i leaders are prisoners of conscience, detained solely for exercising their right to freedom of religion, and I therefore call for their sentence to be overturned and for their immediate and unconditional release. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
More information on the Seven Baha’i Community Leaders

The first session of the Baha’is trial—which had been repeatedly postponed—finally began before a Revolutionary Court in Tehran on January 12, 2010. Two further sessions were held on February 7 and April 12, 2010. Amnesty International has repeatedly criticized proceedings held in Iran’s Revolutionary Courts for their failure to adhere to international standards for fair trials. In fact, the authorities attempted to bar the Baha’is’ lawyers from the courtroom on January 12 and only allowed them access after they insisted upon entering. At the April 12 session, the Baha’is and their attorneys refused to participate in the proceedings when they saw Ministry of Intelligence interrogators and a film crew at what was supposed to be a closed hearing. The judge adjourned the session.
Under Article 502 of Iran’s Penal Code, those convicted of espionage can be sentenced to between one and five years’ imprisonment. Under Article 508, those convicted of the more serious charge of “cooperating with foreign states to harm national security” can face either the death penalty or a sentence of one to 10 years’ imprisonment. “Insulting the religious sanctities” carries the penalty of execution or one to five years’ imprisonment. “Propaganda against the system” carries a penalty of three months to one year’s imprisonment.
The Baha’i faith was founded in Iran about 150 years ago; there are currently an estimated 300,000 Baha’is left in Iran. Since the establishment of the Islamic Republic in Iran, the Baha’i community has faced systematic persecution and harassment. While other minority religions such as Judaism, Zoroastrianism and Christianity are officially recognized, the Baha’i religion is not recognized in Iran’s Constitution and Baha’is are denied equal rights to education and their access to employment and advancement in their jobs is restricted. They are furthermore not allowed to meet or hold religious ceremonies. More than 200 Baha’is were killed after the Iranian Revolution in 1979. A large number of Baha’is left Iran in the following years. The National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of Iran was disbanded in 1983 after the government outlawed all Baha’i administrative institutions. Since then the community’s needs have been met by an informal coordinating group known as the “Yaran” or Friends.
Although persecution of the Baha’is abated since the 1990s, Since President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was first elected in 2005, harassment has increased and several members of the Baha’i community have been arrested. Three of the seven people named above (Fariba Kamalabadi Taefi, Behrouz Tavakkoli, and Jamaloddin Khanjani) had been arrested previously for their activities on behalf of the Baha’i community. The Iranian authorities have blamed the Baha’is, among other groups, for orchestrating much of the unrest that took place on the Shi’a religious observance of ‘Ashoura on December 27, 2009. At least 13 Baha’is were arrested from their homes in Tehran since the demonstrations of that day. Six Baha’is were arrested in March 2010 for having advocated for the right to higher education for Baha’is.
According to the Baha’i International Community, there are currently 47 Baha’is in detention throughout Iran. Baha’is released on bail have been ordered to pay exorbitant amounts. For example, Aziz Samandari and Jinous Sobhani, a former secretary at the Defenders of Human Rights Center, were released on 11 March 2009 on bail of 700 million Rials (approximately $73,000). Didar Raoufi, Payam Aghsani and Nima Haghar were released on the same day and ordered to pay the same amount. Shahrokh Taef was released six days later on 17 March 2009 having paid the same amount in bail.
Email Form: Click to see Instructions
Email Form: Click to see Instructions
[IPW Editor: the website and the form mentioned above are in Persian; Click on the image here to see the email form and instructions on it. Ff you need further help with the form, please contact IPW and we'll be happy to assist  you. Alternatively, you can send an email directly to the email addressinfo@dadiran.ir with the above content.]
Source: http://www.amnestyusa.org/all-countries/iran/seven-bahai-leaders-given-harsh-prison-sentence/page.do?id=1221024
A Baha’i’s Plea For Understanding
Posted: 24 Aug 2010 09:52 AM PDT
Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty / http://www.rferl.org/August 21, 2010
By Christopher Schwartz
Throughout the Muslim world, Baha’is are routinely subjected to systematic derision in the form of elaborate conspiracy theories. Hostile political, religious, and media figures portray Baha’is as a secretive and miserly network of heretics who serve Zionism and Freemasonry to sow discord and undermine a harmonious Islamic society. Worse, we are also often portrayed as deformed subhumans with hidden devil tails and horns.

The symbol of the Baha'i Faith
The symbol of the Baha'i Faith
These claims may be fantastic, but they actually distort certain innocent facts, and the record needs to be set straight.
The accusation of subhumanity is the most hateful. It’s the same kind of the superstitious hate-mongering that has plagued religious minorities throughout human history, including Muslims themselves in the former Yugoslavia. Unfortunately, such slander frightens the Muslim general public and prevents them from learning the truths behind the other accusations.
The accusation of heresy is the most insidious. We do not identify ourselves as Muslim, but as a separate and distinct dispensation and religion. The rationale for this lies in our vision of history. We understand the Koranic statement that Muhammad was the “seal of the prophets” to mean that he was the culmination of a specific spiritual cycle in human history. We are now in a new cycle, one that began in the 19th century with the Baha’i Faith’s two prophets, the Bab (literally, “the gate”), and Baha’u'llah (literally, “the glory of God”).
Yet, because we believe the relationship between God and humanity is an ongoing story — there will be yet more cycles and prophets in the future — we are seen by many Muslim authorities as a challenge to Muhammad’s status as the ultimate vicar of God. Consequently, we’re also seen as a challenge to their own authority, whereas in fact, we have no such ambitions.
To be clear, we believe human history is progressing, under divine guidance, toward world unity and peace. It’s an article of our faith that Baha’is will have a critical — if not the critical — role to play in this development, one of education and example. However, we also believe that peoples of all faith persuasions and traditions, including Muslims, will make key contributions to this process.
The accusation of Zionism is cynical. Because our World Center is in Haifa and our holiest city is Acre, it’s insinuated that we are Zionists or that we work for the Israeli government in exchange for land. In actuality, Acre’s holy distinction derives from the fact that Baha’u'llah was exiled there. The site of the World Center was purchased during Ottoman and British rule through laborious fundraising within the Baha’i community.
Unfortunately, what really bothers some of our detractors is that we have any formal relationship with Israel at all. In truth, the relationship is one of historical necessity, since Baha’is need official Israeli permission to go on pilgrimage. You’ll find very few Baha’is living in Israel or the occupied territories because our leadership asked the community there to leave the country in the 1940s.
Moreover, Baha’is such as myself consider the debate over Israel’s right to exist incompatible with our commitment to the unity of humanity and a distraction from the vital task of peacemaking. We believe in transforming the human landscape into a just and divine order, which means not getting lost in partisan murk.
Finally, the accusation of Freemasonry is just ridiculous. We are often confused about where this charge comes from. Perhaps it’s our scriptures’ themes of illumination and mystical assent or our community’s commitment to collective democratic decision-making. Whatever the case, the accusation overlooks the fact that one of our early leaders, Shoghi Effendi, stipulated that Baha’is cannot be members of secret societies, including the Freemasons.
Of course, I’m a Baha’i. So all I’ve said above could be artful lies. But we Baha’is also believe in every person’s God-given right to investigate truth on their own. So I challenge you: Find a Baha’i and ask to see our activities with your own eyes. Have a little faith in yourself and in your fellow human beings. You’ll find most monsters are nothing more than the shadows of fear.
Christopher Schwartz is a member of the Baha’i Faith and a graduate student of Islamic philosophy and history. The views expressed in this commentary are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
Source: http://www.rferl.org/content/A_Bahais_Plea_For_Understanding/2134055.

Monday, August 23, 2010

Brother’s pain over Iran jailing
Posted: 22 Aug 2010 02:17 AM PDT
The Australian National AppairsIRANIAN Behrouz Tavakkoli is a father of two, psychologist, carpenter and social worker.
He has spent much of his adult life working with the physically and mentally handicapped — “a real angel”, in the words of his brother, Amin.
He is also a follower of the Baha’i faith, which is effectively a crime under the theocratic dictatorship that rules Iran.
Behruz Tavakoli
Behrouz Tavakoli
Last week, Mr Tavakkoli and six other Baha’i leaders were sentenced to 20 years each in jail after being convicted by an Iranian court of the offences of “insulting religious sanctities”, “propaganda against the system” and spying for Israel.
Amin Tavakkoli was at home in suburban Adelaide, where he has lived since fleeing Iran in 1984, when he heard the news of his brother’s conviction.
“It was really a shock for us, for all the Baha’i community, because everybody knows that they are innocent, and I’m sure the regime in Iran knows they are innocent,” he said. “Their arrest was not just, keeping them in prison was not just, and was against the laws of the country.”
Behrouz Tavakkoli and his colleagues in the Iranian Baha’i Society, who include two women, were arrested in June 2008 in a crackdown on the leadership of the 300,000 strong Baha’i community in Iran.
It has endured years of systematic persecution, arbitrary imprisonment and torture. Their conviction after more than two years in prison has been condemned by international human rights groups and foreign governments.
Amnesty International said in a statement: “This verdict is a sad and damning manifestation of the deeply rooted discrimination against Baha’is by the Iranian authorities. These seven Baha’i leaders, some of whom are elderly, are prisoners of conscience jailed solely on account of their beliefs or peaceful activities.”
Nobel Prize-winning lawyer Shirin Ebadi, whose Defenders of Human Rights Centre represented the detainees, said she was “stunned” by the convictions, as the Iranian prosecutor had not provided any evidence to support their guilt. Amnesty described their trial as “a parody” and has called for their immediate release.
The Iranian regime has previously blamed Baha’is, along with other groups, for engineering the political unrest and mass demonstrations that occurred in the aftermath of the country’s rigged elections in June last year, in which President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was returned to power. The Baha’i community has denied any involvement.
Speaking at his home in Adelaide, Amin Tavakkoli told The Weekend Australian his brother’s only activities had been providing social, legal and religious services for the Baha’i people in Iran. “There was no political activity, not at all,” he said. “It’s a law of the Baha’i faith that we shouldn’t be involved in any politics, and we have to obey the law of the country, wherever we are living, and they did (that) perfectly.”
The Australian Baha’i community is holding prayer vigils for the jailed leaders. “Their only crime is they believe in the oneness of humankind, the most important thing in the Baha’i faith, and that is the only crime they have committed,” Amin said.
Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/brothers-pain-over-iran-jailing/story-fn59niix-1225907979115

Friday, August 20, 2010

Renewal of the arrest of four Baha’is of Vilashahr, Isfahan
Posted: 19 Aug 2010 08:55 AM PDT
Baha'is of Vilashahr
Baha'is of Vilashahr
27 Mordad 1389 [18 Aug. 2010]
HRA news – Four socially active Baha’i citizens arrested in Vilashahr Isfahan will be held in detention for 10 more days.

According to a report from the committee of Human Rights Reporters, Jinous Jooshtiyan, Faraz Roohi and Nasim Roohi were
Vilashahr or Vīlā Shahr (Persian: ويلاشهر) is a small town in Iran, located in the rural area of Isfahan (city) and in 5 Kilometre distance of Najafabad.
Vilashahr or Vīlā Shahr (Persian: ويلاشهر) is a small town in Iran, located in the rural area of Isfahan (city) and in 5 Kilometre distance of Najafabad.
arrested on August 5th in a raid by security forces on their homes. Afrooz Roohi, Faraz Roohi’s sister, was also arrested, on August 8th, after being summoned to the courthouse. It appears that these individuals were arrested for providing social services in Quleh-ye Musa Khan Village. These four socially active individuals are currently being kept in Dastgerd prison in Isfahan.
According to a spokesperson of the Baha’i community of Iran, these actions are part of the ongoing oppression of the Baha’i community by the Iranian government, which has led to the imprisonment of 47 Bahai’s and to the 20 year sentencing of the seven incarcerated leaders of the community.
Translation by Iran Press Watch
Source: http://www.hra-news.org/1389-01-27-05-27-21/3430-1.html

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Iran Press Watch » An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 1) » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4717/print/



 
- Iran Press Watch - http://www.iranpresswatch.org -


An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 1)
Posted By admin On August 14, 2009 @ 5:53 pm In Essays | Comments Disabled
















Editor’s Note: Hojjatoleslam Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari (b.1950) is an Iranian cleric, researcher, journalist
and reformist. He has been described as “an active supporter of the revolution” who became “an outspoken and influential critic of the
current Iranian version of theocracy”. He spent seven years in prison after having been convicted in the Special Court for the Clergy [2]
for a number of charges including “insulting Islamic sanctities”. As a result of his conviction, he was de-frocked. Prior to his arrest,
Eshkevari was the Director of the Ali Shariati [3] Research Centre and contributing editor of the newspaper Iran-e Farda, which was
banned in April 2000. Mr. Eshkevari has written several articles in support of human and civil rights of the Iranian Baha’i community,
which Iran Press Watch will bring to the attention of its readers in translation. The present article (which appears below in translation)
had the title, “Hounding the Baha’is and followers of other religious groups from historical religious and Islamic Constitution perspective”
in Persian.


by Hojjatoleslam Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari
Recently, a statement titled “We are Ashamed [4]” was published, addressing the Baha’i community of Iran. About 270 writers,
researchers, journalists, actors and actresses, and intellectuals residing outside Iran put their signatures on this statement. Anyone,
even those least familiar with the contemporary history of Iran (from the time of the Qajar dynasty to present time), knows that this
undertaking has immense importance and implications. It is a turning point for numerous reasons, especially with respect to the
yearning for freedom, equality, or to sum it up,” human rights”.
The bitter reality is, from its inception as a religious phenomena, in 19th century Iran, followers of the Babi [forerunner of the Baha’is]
and Baha’i religions have been continuously subjected to condemnation and persecution by the Muslim society of Iran. There have been
bloody confrontations by Muslims and by governmental authorities in different parts of Iran. This coercion continues in different shapes
and forms to date.
Historically speaking, there is not much room for discussion and argument as to why there has been suppression and why Baha’is have
been subjected to atrocities. Since the beginning of human history, there have always been confrontations between the followers of new



1 of 3


8/18/2010 10:24 AM

 
[1]
 


Iran Press Watch » An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 1) » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4717/print/



and old religions. It could be said that even now there exist confrontations between new and old religious groups. This trend is only a
historical reality, it has nothing to do with which group is right or wrong, whether the truth lies with the followers of the new religion or
with the ones attached to old belief systems and rituals. The same differences have existed between the messengers of God and the
followers of different religions of their time. Also, in the internal history of all the old religions (Zoroastrians, Judaism, Christianity and
Islam), there have been harsh confrontations between sects within the same religion and, to a lesser degree, between devout followers
who have different viewpoints. For example, consider the relentless and bloody attacks on Protestants by Catholics, and the cruelties
inflicted on Catholics by Protestants from the 16th to the 18th century, and massacres by both sides all over Europe. It is said that in the
St. Barthelme Paris battle, about 30,000 Protestants were slaughtered.
The issue is that the followers of the prevailing religion label heterodox thinkers who exit their religion as heretics and apostates and
ultimately consider them as enemies of God, enemies of their prophet, and enemies of their legitimate devout governing bodies. They
are under the impression that, as a religious obligation and to attain God and His messenger’s salvation, it is their responsibility to
protect their faith. This is the logic behind the harsh confrontation of religious rulers of different eras with the apostates of their time. It
should be noted that at the beginning the issue is only religious, but later on, especially when the dissenting group completely branches
out and separates from the existing religion, numerous political, economical and even personal and group egotistic factors play a crucial
and decisive role in prolonging the violence.
If we look at the Baha’is of Iran from a historical perspective, their mistreatment is clearly the repetition of what has happened a
thousand times throughout the history of Iran, the world, and Islam. Shortly after its growth and expansion, combined with political,
social, and cultural factors, the struggles and complexities between the ruling religious groups and the Baha’is increased.
From the start of the Babi movement, over 150 years ago, we have experienced a lot of social, cultural and political changes; moreover
we have initiated and put behind us two big social and political revolutions. It is surprising that in this long period, with respect to human
rights and civil rights, the “Baha’i issue” has not only remained unresolved, but has become even more complicated and even more
grievous in recent years. The important matter is that in the long periods of human and civil rights discussions, the rights of the
followers of the Baha’i faith have been completely overlooked. There has been a silence and ambiguity as if a religion by the name of
Baha’i faith did not exist in Iran and a considerable number of followers of this religion did not live alongside other citizens in our
homeland.
The silence on the part of Muslims is somewhat understandable, but this intentional and unintentional silence is also noticeable among
non-religious groups, such as secular humanists, democrats, freedom fighters, and irreligious leftists. In all the talks and writings of the
freedom fighters and justice seekers from the pre-constitutional revolution to date, there has been almost no mention of Iranian Baha’is
and their civil rights. In the Constitution not only is there no mention of them, but their role in political and social change is undermined.
At that time, even being a Babi (forerunners of Baha’is) was equivalent to being guilty of being an “enemy of the people”. In the Islamic
revolution of 1979, and in the Islamic Constitution, the silence is even heavier.
The main reason, or one of the main reasons for this silence is that the “Baha’i issue” has been taboo; no one has dared to approach the
Baha’i faith and openly discuss it. It is surprising that in the Islamic regime, non-religious and anti-religious persons have been victims of
the same taboos and oppressive atmosphere.
Because of the ongoing, wide-scale boycott and censorship, few researchers have taken the liberty to study Baha’i ideologies and to
familiarize the public with Baha’i beliefs, ideas, spiritual and social laws, an accurate history of their faith and of its followers. Hardly
any researchers have been free from religious and political quarrels and pre-judgments, in order that they could mention who the Baha’is
are, what they offer and what role they play in shaping the contemporary history of Iran. For this reason, even today, neither the
general public nor researchers have accurate information about Baha’is and their convictions. Accurate and trustworthy documentation
about the Baha’is is rare or nonexistent in Iran.
On the contrary – the immense volumes of anti-Baha’i writings that are available are often worthless, void of substance, non-scientific
and laden with blind religious discrimination and prejudice. The same boycott and censorship imposed upon Baha’i ideas has in general
harmed the free flow of information and research findings. In any case, the emergence of the Baha’i faith in Iran at the time of the Qajar




2 of 3



8/18/2010 10:24 AM

Iran Press Watch » An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 1) » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4717/print/



Dynasty is a part of our history. Neutral, scientific research and an overall understanding of the Baha’i faith is integral to a thorough
understanding of the general, religious, and social history of our land.
Now is the time to forgo this boycott and censorship. It is mainly the responsibility of broadminded people and researchers to investigate
Baha’i ideologies and to end this void and poverty of accurate information. It is the ethical and the humanitarian duty of open-minded
free thinkers, democrats, freedom fighters and human rights activists, to defend and endeavor to restore the lost rights of the Baha’is.
Similarly, it is their responsibility to uphold the rights of all other Iranian residents, irrespective of their religion, convictions, political
and social views. The foundation of democracy and liberty is based on the equality of human beings, meaning that the innate and natural
human rights of any Iranian living in any geographical part of the country is equal to the right of any other Iranian. Based on this logic
no one is considered more Iranian than any other. On the surface, we have accepted this reasoning since the time of the Constitutional
Revolution, but in reality, we are living in an era before the Constitutional Revolution.
It seems that in our culture, our main quandary is due to religious beliefs. There is a lot of room for argument and discussion in this area
which I can’t get into at this time. I only make a suggestion to the theologians and the learned, to ponder and issue laws based on the
duty to act rationally and to follow the guidelines within the framework of the general Islamic laws and wholesome religious principals. I
request a response to my question: “Assume the first generation of the Baha’is were considered heretics: why, and based on what
rationale, should the next generations until the day of resurrection be called heretics?” Is the religious ruling for the Baha’is any different
from the ruling for Muslims converting to Christianity or Judaism? I believe it does not make any difference whether one is converting to
a religion recognized by Islamic rulers (Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians) or not. When someone strays from Islam, he is exiting
Islam, whether the conversion is to any religion or to no religion.
Today we are living in a world whose foundation of social interaction is based upon the equality of human beings. No citizen may be
deprived of his civil rights because of his beliefs, convictions, race, religion or any other differentiating factor. At one time Sheikh
Fazlollah Noori[1] said, “in Islam the foundation is based on discrimination and not on equality”. Are our theologians upholding the same
belief after the passage of a century? If that is the case, what is the meaning of the claim “Islam values human beings”, and is a “just
religion”?


[1] Sheikh Fazlollah Noori was a prominent Shiite Muslim cleric in Iran during the late 19th and early 20th century who fought against the
Iranian Constitutional Revolution and was executed for treason as a result. Today he is considered a martyr in the fight against
democracy by Islamic conservatives in Iran.
[Posted on July 9, 2009, at Roozonline. Translation by Iran Press Watch.]



Article printed from Iran Press Watch: http://www.iranpresswatch.org
URL to article: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4717
URLs in this post:
Image: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Eshkevari.jpg
Special Court for the Clergy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Court_for_the_Clergy
Ali Shariati: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Shariati
We are Ashamed: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/998

Copyright © 2009 Iran Press Watch. All rights reserved.




3 of 3



8/18/2010 10:24 AM
[1]
 
[2]
 
[3]
 
[4]
 


An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 2)

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4729/print/



In response to the repeated questions and enquiries of his followers as to the treatment of the Baha’is, Shaykh Morteza Ansari[2] once
said that since he had no knowledge about the Baha’is, he was in no position to express any opinion.
I suggest that the respected theologians and researchers give higher priority to the scientific investigation of different religious and
non-religious beliefs, especially the Baha’i faith, while following the guidelines of Islamic principles, in order to come up with responses
that are fair, logical, defendable and implementable. This is what some theologians, such as Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri[3], have
courageously started. He has openly and in writing defended the human rights and the civil rights of the Baha’is. He has forbidden the
imposition of offences and transgressions on their belongings, lives and other rights. This is an important step forward within the
framework of Shiite religious rulings.
Silence and indifference will not resolve problems; rather it will increase problems and will open the way for further transgressions of the
civil rights of our Baha’i countrymen.
I would like to have a few words with the ruling authorities of the Islamic Republic. Thirty years have elapsed since the onset of the
Islamic revolution. Still, the rulers are the dissidents and the fighters who opposed the dictatorship of the Pahlavi regime. Still, the
promises made by the leader of the revolution – Khomeini- and the other revolutionists, are not forgotten. Please clarify for the public:
was the establishment of Islamic Justice for the Nation of Iran with respect to human rights and access to opportunities based on
discrimination, and intended only for specific segments of society?
I specifically and clearly ask: are Shiite Muslims who follow the path of the Imam, who believe in the Theological Protector (Vali-e Faqih)
as the absolute, univocal ruler, and who are melted in Islamic theology the only ones entitled to all the amenities and the opportunities
that the country has to offer? Are all the options and prospects only available to the saved Muslims? If the answer is “yes”, why weren’t
the people informed at the start of the revolution – when all were fighting for freedom from dictatorship? Please clarify: is equality, by
its true meaning or even its relative meaning granted to all, in your Islamic regime? Can you give a positive response to my question?
Even if you say, “yes”, it won’t be believable. There are thousands of clear and undeniable instances that are contrary to such a claim,
which would prove your claim false.
It is clear that the Iranian revolution was for the purpose of the implementation of the Constitution, providing freedom and justice for all.
These two aspirations will come to fruition only if the principals of equality and equal rights which are the innate and natural rights of
individuals are accessible to all and cover all aspects of the nation’s personal and social lives, without the slightest discrimination. This is
a clear stand without any ambiguity and cannot be transgressed or justified otherwise.
Now, I ask: aren’t Iranian Baha’is part of the Iranian nation? Where is there any mention of their rights in the Islamic Constitution?
Certainly, in response to my question you will talk about the constitutional rights of the followers of major recognized religions who have
Holy Books.
I should say, first, documenting laws in the articles of the Constitution applicable to the recognized religions is wrong. These rules are
openly in contradiction with the principal of complete equality and individual civil rights. The exceptions exclude a sizable number of
Iranian citizens from their natural rights.
Second, the more fundamental problem is that, with respect to citizens without so-called Holy Books (Ismailia’s, Zaidiehs, Baha’is,
irreligious, etc.), there are no defined civil rights entitlements in the Islamic Constitution.
Third, in some of the articles of the Constitution equality is confirmed, freedom to believe in any conviction is substantiated and
inquisition into individual beliefs is forbidden. This means those other than Shiite Muslims should have religious freedom and their rights
must not be contravened merely because of their convictions. It is nonsense to say individuals are free to choose their belief system, but
have no right to public education, employment or to teach their religious beliefs. If there are contradictions in the articles of the
Constitution, that is your predicament. Iranian citizens should not pay for your problems.
Fourth, let us forget about everything else. Baha’is and others are living in an Islamic society and under the rules of Islamic governing
bodies – shouldn’t the law of Mostaman [under protection] be guaranteed for them? Shouldn’t they feel safe in an Islamic regime?



1 of 3


8/18/2010 12:27 PM
Iran
 


Iran Press Watch » An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 2) » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4729/print/


[

p

]

g

y

g

Shouldn’t their belongings, lives and dignity be safeguarded? Shouldn’t they be entitled to the basic rights of living in peace, receiving
education and employment? Isn’t it true that they are denied the right to enter universities? Isn’t it true that even their dead cannot
rest in peace in their graves? Which religious rules and laws permit such heinous, inhumane and repulsive acts? Do you believe this
treatment is to the benefit of religion – of Islam – and the followers of this religion?
One issue remains unresolved, and that is with respect to allegations against Baha’is, Sufi’s and others. As I am neither an investigator
nor a judge, I refrain from expressing any opinion in this regard. Only as a Muslim and a well-wishing Iranian, I clearly see my religion
and my country subject to public scrutiny. I request that you proceed with the court hearings of the Baha’is [Yaran], in a just assembly
and adhering to complete and proper legal proceedings, in order to remove any trace of doubt or suspicion regarding your true motives.
If this request is not adhered to, no one inside Iran or outside of Iran will believe in the legitimacy of your alleged charges. You are
claiming that you have convincing, indisputable and irrefutable evidence. Why shouldn’t you welcome the proceedings in an open court,
in which Baha’is are represented by their own legal counsel, in a just assembly?
This behavior has caused questions to be raised about Islam and the Islamic revolution of Iran; moreover, a number of ignorant, rigid
and prejudiced individuals insist that the rules and procedures implemented in the country are as they were meant to be from the
beginning, and that promises to the contrary which were made at the onset of the revolution were only intended to deceive the nation.
As far as I, a pro-revolution Muslim clergyman, who is more or less familiar with Islam and Islamic principles, can honestly testify, in the
years preceding the revolution the thought that there would be discrimination in an Islamic regime in which free-thinkers, non-Muslims
and even Muslims would be deprived of their lawful rights did not even cross my mind. Maybe I was naïve and did not see the obstacles
in the way, but I was under the impression that the old inapplicable laws and commands would give way to renewed and revived
religious rules suitable for this day and age, by adoption of the principle of Ijtehad [the Islamic legal principle of procedures for making
rulings on matters not included in the Qur'an – translator].
At this time, I cannot further discuss the matter. For today’s generation, however, I will describe two incidents in order to impart a
sense of my feelings and thoughts from that time [the onset of the Islamic revolution – translator].
In early 1979 [shortly before the establishment of the Islamic regime – translator], I was on a religious teaching trip in Soghad –
Abadeh. One night, two young men visited me. They asked my permission for a midnight raid on the Baha’i Center of that area in order
to obtain incriminating documented evidence [to be used against the Baha’is – translator] and permission to ultimately destroy that
center. Hearing such a strange and unexpected request so shocked and terrified me that for several moments I was dumbfounded,
unable to talk or show any reaction. Then with full force, I made all possible attempts to discourage the two zealous youth from
committing such an atrocity. I reasoned with them saying, “it is not the intention of the Islamic government to persecute anyone
because of his adherence to a different faith or conviction. Everyone will be free to choose his own path”.
I especially remember quoting Khomeini, the leader of the revolution, to this effect. With reasoning and even pleading and insisting, I
tried to stop them from committing a heinous act. By the time they left, they seemed convinced. However, the two youth came back
two days later; they had raided the Baha’i center and obtained some documents, but had refrained from demolishing the place. They
gave me a bunch of papers to investigate. I strongly condemned their act. Of course, I should mention that in those bunched up papers
there was nothing but a few membership receipts and some flyers about Baha’i teachings.
The next memory is from the post-revolution period. I was elected as a member of the first parliament of the Islamic Republic of Iran
representing electoral units of Shahsavar [now Tonekabon] and Ramsar. Two representatives of the Baha’i community came to visit;
they congratulated me and presented a letter. In that letter, after expressing immense respect towards Islam and the prophet of Islam,
they had requested entitlement of the Baha’is to their human and civil rights and an end to their long-lasting deprivations. They added,
“Baha’is, due to their religious laws, avoid involvement in partisan politics at all times. Baha’is desire the progress of Iran and want to
be citizens of Iran”. I thanked them and said, “The purpose of the revolution is to bring about freedom and justice for all Iranians, I hope
everyone benefits from liberty; Baha’is are Iranians and are entitled to the same benefits”. I added, “In this path, there are cultural
obstacles; time is required to remove all impediments. Be patient and don’t be in a rush to obtain your full rights. As a member of the
parliament and representative of the people, I will defend the rights of the whole nation without any exceptions or discrimination”.



2 of 3


8/18/2010 12:27 PM

Iran Press Watch » An Iranian Cleric Protests Trial of Yaran (part 2) » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4729/print/




Alas, after a short while at the parliament, I realized that the course of affairs was such that there was no possibility for me or others like
myself to defend the rights of other parliament members, let alone the rights of Baha’is and other citizens. In other words, I, as the
people’s representative, could not even defend my own rights. When a member of parliament is beaten up by another member because
his speech was not liked, how can he defend the rights of others?!
Today, 30 years after the start of the revolution, holding memorial services for devout Muslims like Mr. Bazargan – the first prime
minister of the first government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, or for Dr. Sahabi - a member of the National Religious Group, or even
holding purely religious ceremonies for special religious occasions, is prohibited; you can imagine what it is like for others!


[2] Sheikh Morteza Ansari (~1781-1864), was a Shia jurist who was generally acknowledged as the most eminent jurist of the time.
Ansari has also been called the “first effective” model or marja’ taqlid [source of emulation] of the Shia or “the first scholar universally
recognized as the supreme authority in matters of Shii law. See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morteza_Ansari [3].
[3] Hossein-Ali Montazeri (born in 1922), is an Iranian scholar, theologian, writer and human rights activist. He was one of the leaders of
the Iranian Revolution in 1979. He is best known as the one-time designated successor to the revolution’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Khomeini, but fell out with Khomeini in 1989 over government policies that Montazeri claimed infringed on freedom and denied people’s
rights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosein-Ali_Montazeri [4]


[Posted on July 9, 2009, at: Rooz. Translation by Iran Press Watch.]



Article printed from Iran Press Watch: http://www.iranpresswatch.org
URL to article: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4729
URLs in this post:
Image: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Eshkevari1.jpg
here: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa/post/267
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morteza_Ansari: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morteza_Ansari
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosein-Ali_Montazeri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosein-Ali_Montazeri


















3 of 3

















8/18/2010 12:27 PM
[1]
 
[2]
 
[3]
 
[4]
 


Iran Press Watch ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و ﻖﺣ مﺎﻧ ﻪﺑ « ﯽﺳرﺎﻓ » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa/post/267/print/




- Iran Press Watch ﯽﺳرﺎﻓ - http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa -



ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و ﻖﺣ مﺎﻧ ﻪﺑ
Posted By admin On July 19, 2009 @ 11:08 am In 2 | نارﺎﻳ ,تﻻﺎﻘﻣ ,ﻩﺎﮔﺪﻳد ,ﺮﺸﺑ قﻮﻘﺣ ,ﻪﺌﻃﻮﺗ مﺎﻬﺗا ,نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ رازﺁ Comments



[1]



ﻦﻳﻻنﺁزور ﺖﻳﺎﺳبو زا ﻞﻘﻧ ﻪﺑ


يرﻮﮑﺷا ﻲﻔﺳﻮﻳ ﻦﺴﺣ


ﺎﻀﻣا ار نﺁ رﻮﺸﮐ زا جرﺎﺧ ﻢﻴﻘﻣ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ناﺮﮑﻔﻨﺷور و ناﺮﮔﺎﻤﻨﻴﺳ ،نارﺎﮕﻧ ﻪﻣﺎﻧزور ،ناﺮﮕﺸهوﮋﭘ ،نﺎﮔﺪﻨﺴﻳﻮﻧ زا ﺮﻔﻧ 270 ﺎﺒﻳﺮﻘﺗ ﻪﮐ ﻪﺘﻓﺎﻳ رﺎﺸﺘﻧاﻢﻴﻨﻴﮕﻣﺮﺷ ﺎﻣ ناﻮﻨﻋﺎﺑ يا ﻪﻴﻧﺎﻴﺑ ناﺮﻳا نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺎﺑ طﺎﺒﺗرا رد اﺮﻴﺧا
.ﺪﻧا ﻩدﺮﮐ
ﺮﻴﺳ وﺮﺸﺑ قﻮﻘﺣ ﻪﻤﻠﮐ ﮏﻳ رد و يﺮﺑاﺮﺑ و يدازﺁ ﺮﻈﻨﻣ زا ﻩﮋﻳﻮﺑ و ﻒﻠﺘﺨﻣ تﺎﻬﺟزا ﻪﻧﺎﻴﺑ ﻦﻳا و ماﺪﻗا ﻦﻳا ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧاد¬ﻲﻣ ﺪﺷﺎﺑ ﻪﺘﺷاد ( نﻮﻨﮐ ﺎﺗ ﻪﻳرﺎﺟﺎﻗ زﺎﻏﺁ زا ) ناﺮﻳا ﺮﺻﺎﻌﻣ ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ ﺎﺑ ﻲﻳﺎﻨﺷﺁ ﮎﺪﻧا ﻲﺴﮐﺮﮔا
،ناﺮﻳا رد يﺮﺠه ﻢهدﺰﻴﺳ ةﺪﺳ مود ﻪﻤﻴﻧ رد ﺖﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ و ﺖﻴﺑﺎﺑ ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا ﻲﻨﻳد ةﺪﻳﺪﭘ رﻮﻬﻇ زﺎﻏﺁ زا ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻦﻳا ﺦﻠﺗ ﺖﻴﻌﻗاو .دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ ﻩدﺮﻤﺷ راﺬﮔﺮﺛا ﻲﻔﻄﻋ ﻪﻄﻘﻧ ﻲﺗرﺎﺒﻋ ﻪﺑ و ﻢﻬﻣ رﺎﻴﺴﺑ ناﺮﻳا رد ﻲهاﻮﺧ يدازﺁ
ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﻣﺁ ﺪﻳﺪﭘ ناﺮﻳا ﻒﻠﺘﺨﻣ ﻲﺣاﻮﻧ رد ﺖﻗو يﺎﻬﺘﻣﻮﮑﺣ و نﺎﻧﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﺎﺑ ﻦﻴﺋﺁﻮﻧ ﻩوﺮﮔ ﻦﻳا لاﺪﺟ رد ﻲﻨﻴﻧﻮﺧ و ﺦﻠﺗ يﺎهداﺪﺧر و ﻪﺘﻓﺮﮔ راﺮﻗ رازﺁ و دﺮﻃ و ﻲﻔﻧ درﻮﻣ رﻮﺸﮐ ﻦﻳا نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﻪﻌﻣﺎﺟ رد ﻩراﻮﻤه نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ
.ﺖﺳا نﺎﻳﺮﺟ رد ﻒﻠﺘﺨﻣ لﺎﮑﺷا رد ﻢهزﻮﻨه
و ﻪﺘﺷاد دﻮﺟو نﺎﻨﻴﺋﺁ ﻪﻨﻬﮐ ﺎﺑ نﺎﻨﻴﺋﺁﻮﻧ لاﺪﺟ ﺮﺸﺑ ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ راودا مﺎﻤﺗ رد ﻪﮐاﺮﭼ ،ﺖﺴﻴﻧ ﻪﺸﻗﺎﻨﻣ و ﺚﺤﺑ يﺎﺟ ناﺪﻨﭼ ﻲﺨﻳرﺎﺗ فﺮﺻ ﺮﻈﻨﻣ زا ﻪﺘﻓﺮﮔ ترﻮﺻ ﻲﻳﺎهرﺎﺘﻓر ﻦﻴﻨﭼ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺎﺑ اﺮﭼ و ﻩدﻮﺑ ﻦﻴﻨﭼ اﺮﭼ ﻪﮐ ﻦﻳا رد
نﺎﻴﺑ ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ ،دراﺪﻧ ﻦﻬﮐ بادﺁ و رﺎﮑﻓا نﺎﮕﺘﺴﺒﻟد ﺎﻳو نﺎﻳﻮﺟﻮﻧ رﺎﮑﻓا ﻲﺘﺳردﺎﻧ ﺎﻳ و ﻲﺘﺳرد ﻪﺑ ﻲﻄﺑر ﻪﺘﺒﻟا داﺪﺧر ﻦﻳا .ﺖﺴه و ﻩدﻮﺑ ﻩوﺮﮔ ود ﻦﻴﺑ لﻮﻤﻌﻣ و يدﺎﻋ درﻮﺧﺮﺑ ﮏﻳ ﺰﻴﻧ نﻮﻨﮐا ﻦﻴﻤه ﺎﺗ ﺖﻔﮔ ناﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻣ
و ﺖﻴﺤﻴﺴﻣ ،ﺖﻳدﻮﻬﻳ ،ﺖﻴﺸﺗرز ) ﻲﻧﻮﻨﮐ ﻩﺪﺷ ﻪﻨﻳدﺎﻬﻧ و ﻲﺨﻳرﺎﺗ نﺎﻳدا مﺎﻤﺗ ﻲﻧورد ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ رد .ﺖﺳا ﻪﺘﺷاد دﻮﺟو ﻩراﻮﻤه ﺰﻴﻧ نﺎﺸﻧﺎﻣز مدﺮﻣ نﺎﻳدا و رﺎﮑﻓا ﺎﺑ ﻲﻨﻳد ﺮه ناﺮﺒﻣﺎﻴﭘ ﻦﻴﺑ داﺪﺧر ﻦﻳا .ﺖﺳا ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ ﺖﻴﻌﻗاو
و ﻦﺸﺧ و ﺪﻨﺗ درﻮﺧﺮﺑ ﻪﺑ ناﻮﺗ ﻲﻣ ﻪﻧﻮﻤﻧ ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑﺎﻓﺮﺻ .ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﻣﺁ ﺶﻴﭘ ﺶﻳﺪﻧا توﺎﻔﺘﻣ ﻲﮐﺪﻧا ناراﺪﻨﻳد ﺖﻳﺮﺜﮐا ﺎﺑ نﺁ زا ﺮﺘﻤﮐ ﺐﺗاﺮﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻩﺎﮔ ﻲﺘﺣو ﻲﺑﺎﻌﺸﻧا نﺎﺸﻳﺪﻧاﺮﮔد ﻦﻴﺑ ﻲﺘﺨﺳ يﺎﻬﻟاﺪﺟ ﻩراﻮﻤه ﺰﻴﻧ ( مﻼﺳا
ﺲﻳرﺎﭘ ﻲﻤﻠﺗرﺎﺑ ﺖﻨﺳ رﺎﺘﺸﮐ نﺁ ﻪﻧﻮﻤﻧ ﮏﻳ ﻪﮐ دﺮﮐ ﻩرﺎﺷا ﺎﭘورا ﺮﺳاﺮﺳ رد فﺮﻃودﺮه زا ﻩدﺮﺘﺴﮔ يﺎه رﺎﺸﮐ و ﻢهﺪﺠه ﻞﻗاﺪﺣ ﺎﺗ ﻢهدﺰﻧﺎﺷ ةﺪﺳ زا ﺎه ﮏﻴﻟﻮﺗﺎﮐ ﺎﺑ ﺎﻬﻧﺎﺘﺴﺗوﺮﭘ ﺪﻌﺑ و ﺎﻬﻧﺎﺘﺴﺗوﺮﭘ ﺎﺑ ﺎه ﮏﻴﻟﻮﺗﺎﮐ ﻦﻴﻧﻮﺧ
رد و ﺪﺗﺮﻣ و فﺮﺤﻨﻣ ار دﻮﺧ ﻦﻳد زا نﺎﮔﺪﺷ جرﺎﺧ و نﺎﮔﺪﻨﻨﮐ بﺎﻌﺸﻧا ﻩﮋﻳﻮﺑ نﺎﺸﻳﺪﻧا ﺮﮔد ﻩراﻮﻤه ﻲﻤﺳر و ﺞﻳار ناراﺪﻨﻳد ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻦﻳا ﻲﻠﺻا ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ .ﺪﻧﺪﺷ ﻪﺘﺸﮐ نﺎﺘﺴﺗوﺮﭘ 30000 دوﺪﺣ نﺁ ﻲﻃ ﺎﻳﻮﮔ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا
و نﺎﻴﮐ زا ﺖﻈﻓﺎﺤﻣ ياﺮﺑ و شﺮﺒﻣﺎﻴﭘ و ﺪﻧواﺪﺧ ﺖﻳﺎﺿر ﺐﺴﮐ ياﺮﺑ و ﻲﻋﺮﺷ ﻒﻴﻠﮑﺗ ﮏﻳ ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧروﺎﺑ ﻦﻳاﺮﺑ و ﺪﻨﻧاد ﻲﻣ ﻢﮐﺎﺣ عوﺮﺸﻣ ﻲﻨﻳد ﻪﻌﻣﺎﺟ و دﻮﺧ ﻦﻤﺷد مﺮﺟﻻ و نﺎﺸﻨﻳد ﺮﺒﻣﺎﻴﭘ و اﺪﺧ ﻦﻤﺷد ﺖﻳﺎﻬﻧ
ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ ﺎه ﻲﺸﻳﺪﻧاﺮﮔد ﻦﻳا زﺎﻏﺁ رد ﻻﺎﻤﺘﺣا ﻪﮐ ﺖﺷاد ﻪﺟﻮﺗ ﻢﻬﻣ ﻪﺘﮑﻧ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ ﺪﻳﺎﺑ ﺎﺻﻮﺼﺨﻣ .ﺖﺳا نﺎﺸﻨﻳد ناﺪﺗﺮﻣ ﺎﺑ يﺮﺼﻋ ﺮه ﻢﮐﺎﺣ ناراﺪﻨﻳد ﻦﺸﺧ درﻮﺧﺮﺑ ﺖﺑﺎﺛ ﻖﻄﻨﻣ ﻦﻳا .ﺪﻨﺷﻮﮑﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧﺪﻬﻌﺘﻣ دﻮﺧ ﻦﻳد ﺖﻳدﻮﺟﻮﻣ
ﻩﺪﻨﻨﮐ ﻦﻴﻴﻌﺗ و ﻢﻬﻣ رﺎﻴﺴﺑ ﺶﻘﻧ ﺎﻬﻟاﺪﺟ ﻦﻳا رد ﻲﺗﺎﻘﺒﻃ و ﻲهوﺮﮔ و ﻲﺼﺨﺷ يﺎه ﻩ ﺰﻴﮕﻧا ﻲﺘﺣ و يدﺎﺼﺘﻗا و ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ دﺪﻌﺘﻣ ﻞﻣاﻮﻋ ،ﺪﺳﺮﺑ ﻞﻣﺎﮐ و يﺪﺟ بﺎﻌﺸﻧا ﻪﺑ ﻲﺸﻳﺪﻧا ﺮﮔد ﻪﮐ ﻲﻧﺎﻣز ﻩﮋﻳﻮﺑ ﺎه ﺪﻌﺑ ﺎﻣا ﻩدﻮﺑ ﻲﻨﻳد ﻂﻘﻓ
و ﻢﻬﻓ ﻞﺑﺎﻗ ياﺮﺟﺎﻣ ،ﻢﻳﺮﮕﻨﺑ ﻲﺨﻳرﺎﺗ ﻞﻴﻠﻌﺗ و ﻞﻴﻠﺤﺗ ﺮﻈﻨﻣ زا ﺎﻓﺮﺻ لﺎﺣ و ﻪﺘﺷﺬﮔ رد ناﺮﻳا نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ ياﺮﺟﺎﻣ ﻪﺑ ﺮﮔا .ﺪﻨﻧﺎﺳر¬ﻲﻣ يرﺎﻳ ﺎﻬﮕﻨﺟ و ﺎﻬﻳﺮﻴﮔرد مواﺪﺗ و شﺮﺘﺴﮔ ﻪﺑ ﻞﻣاﻮﻋ ﻦﻳا و ﺪﻨﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ اﺪﻴﭘ يا
فﺮﻃ ود زا ﻲﮕﻨهﺮﻓ و ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا و ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ ﻞﻣاﻮﻋ ﺎﺑ نﺁ نﺪﺷ ﻲﻣﻮﻤﻋ و شﺮﺘﺴﮔ زﺎﻏﺁ زا ﺲﭘ ﻲﮐﺪﻧا اﺮﺟﺎﻣ ﻦﻳا .ﺖﺳا مﻼﺳا و نﺎﻬﺟ و ناﺮﻳا ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ رد ﻩرﺎﺑ راﺰه ﺪﻨﭼ راﺮﮑﺗ يا ﻪﻬﺟاﻮﻣ ﻦﻴﻨﭼ و ﺖﺳا ﻲﻣﺎﻬﺑا ﻲﺑ
.دوﺰﻓا ﻦﻴﺑﺎﻤﻴﻓ ﻂﺑاور ﻲﮔﺪﻴﭽﻴﭘ و ﺎﻬﻟاﺪﺟ ﺮﺑ ﺎه ﻲﮕﺘﺨﻴﻣﺁ ﻦﻳا و ﺖﺨﻴﻣﺁ رد
و ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا بﻼﻘﻧا ود و ﻩدﺮﮐ ﻪﺑﺮﺠﺗ ار يدﺎﻳز ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ و ﻲﮕﻨهﺮﻓ و ﻲﻧﺪﻣ تﻻﻮﺤﺗ و تاﺮﻴﻴﻐﺗ ﻩﺎﺗﻮﮐ ناﺪﻨﭼ ﻪﻧ نارود ﻦﻳا لﻮﻃ رد ﺎﻣ و ﻪﺘﺷﺬﮔ يﺮﮕﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺶﺒﻨﺟ و اﺮﺟﺎﻣ نﺁ زﺎﻏﺁ زا لﺎﺳ 150 زا ﺶﻴﺑ نﻮﻨﮐا ﺎﻣا
و ﺮﺗ ﻩﺪﻴﭽﻴﭘ ﺮﻴﺧا نارود رد ﻲﺘﺣ ﻪﮐ ﻩﺪﻧﺎﻣ ﻞﺤﻨﻳﻻ ﺎﻬﻨﺗ ﻪﻧ نﺎﻨﭽﻤهنﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ و ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا قﻮﻘﺣﺮﻈﻧ زا زارد نﺎﻣز ﻦﻳا رد ﻪﮐ ﻦﻳا ﺖﻔﮕﺷ و ﻢﻳا¬ﻩدﺎﻬﻧ ﺮﺳ ﺖﺸﭘ و ﻩدروﺁ ﺪﻳﺪﭘ ار ﻲﮔرﺰﺑ ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ
ﺮﺑ تﻮﮑﺳ و مﺎﻬﺑا رد ﻊﻗاو رد و ﻩﺪﺷ شﻮﻣاﺮﻓ ﻲﻠﮐ ﻪﺑ ﻲﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺶﻴﮐ ناوﺮﻴﭘ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ و ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا قﻮﻘﺣ و ﺖﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻲﻧﻻﻮﻃ نارود ﻦﻳا رد ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا نﺁ ﻢﻬﻣ رﺎﻴﺴﺑ ﻪﺘﮑﻧ نﺎﻴﻣ ﻦﻳا رد .ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﺷ ﻢه ﺮﺗ¬ﻢﻴﺧو يدوﺪﺣﺎﺗ
يﻮﺳ زا دﺮﻃ ﻲﺘﺣ و تﻮﮑﺳ ﻦﻳا .ﺪﻨﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻤﻧ ﻲﮔﺪﻧز ﮎﺮﺘﺸﻣ ﻦﻬﻴﻣ ﻦﻳا رد ﺶﻴﮐ ﻦﻳا ناوﺮﻴﭘ ناﻮﻨﻋﺎﺑ نﺎﻴﻧاﺮﻳا زا ﻲﻬﺟﻮﺗ ﻞﺑﺎﻗ رﺎﻤﺷ و دراﺪﻧ دﻮﺟو ناﺮﻳا رد ﻲﻳﺎﻬﺑ مﺎﻧ ﻪﺑ ﻲﺸﻴﮐ ﺎﻳﻮﮔ ﻪﮐ يا ﻪﻧﻮﮔ ﻪﺑ ،ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﺷ راﺰﮔ
ﻩﺪﻳد ﺰﻴﻧ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ ﭗﭼ ﺎﻳ و ﻩاﻮﺨﻳدازﺁ و تاﺮﮐﻮﻣد ﺮﺻﺎﻨﻋ و ﺎهرﻻﻮﮑﺳ و ﺎه ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ نﺎﺑزو ﻦهذ رد يﺪﻤﻋ ﺮﻴﻏ و يﺪﻤﻋ ﻲﺷﻮﻣاﺮﻓ و تﻮﮑﺳ ﻦﻳا ﺎﻣا ﺖﺳا ﮎرد و ﻢﻬﻓ ﻞﺑﺎﻗ يدوﺪﺣ ﺎﺗ نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ناراﺪﻨﻳد
ﻪﻧ ﻪﻃوﺮﺸﻣ ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ رد .دور¬ﻲﻤﻧ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ قﻮﻘﺣ حﺮﻃ و نﺎﻴﻧاﺮﻳا رﺎﻤﺷ ﻦﻳا زا ﻲﻨﺨﺳ ﺎﺒﻳﺮﻘﺗ ،ﻻﺎﺣ ﻦﻴﻤه ﺎﺗ ﻪﻃوﺮﺸﻣ ﻞﺒﻗﺎﻣ نﺎﺒﻠﻃ ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و نﺎهاﻮﺨﻳدازﺁ يﺎه ﻪﺘﺷﻮﻧ و ﺎه ﻪﺘﻔﮔ مﺎﻤﺗ رد .دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ
ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ و 57 ﻲﻣﻼﺳا بﻼﻘﻧا رد .دﻮﺑ مﺎﻬﺗا ﮏﻳ ندﻮﺑﻲﺑﺎﺑ نﺎﻣز نﺁ رد ﻲﺘﺣ .ﺪﻧراﺪﻧ ﺰﻴﻧ ﻩﺪﺷ مﻼﻋا رﻮﻀﺣ ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا و ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ يﺎه داﺪﺧر و تﻻﻮﺤﺗ رد نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﮑﻠﺑ ﺖﺴﻴﻧ نﺎﻨﻳا قﻮﻘﺣ زا يدﺎﻳ ﺎﻬﻨﺗ
نﺪﺷ ﮏﻳدﺰﻧ تأﺮﺟ ﻲﺴﮐ و ﻩدﻮﺑﻮﺑﺎﺗ ﮏﻳ ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑ ﻩراﻮﻤهنﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻩدﻮﺑ ﻦﻳا ( ﻲﻠﺻا ﻞﻳﻻد زا ﻲﮑﻳ ﺪﻳﺎﺷو ) ﻲﻠﺻا ﺖﻠﻋ ﻻﺎﻤﺘﺣا .دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ ﻩﺪهﺎﺸﻣ ﺮﺗ ﻦﻴﮕﻨﺳ تﻮﮑﺳ ﻦﻳا ﻢه ﻲﻣﻼﺳا يرﻮﻬﻤﺟ
ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ ﻪﺟﻮﺗ ﺎﺑ .ﺪﻧا ﻩﺪﺷ ﻮﺑﺎﺗ ﻦﻳا و ﺎﻀﻓ ﻦﻳا بﻮﻠﻐﻣ و رﻮﻬﻘﻣ ﺰﻴﻧ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺪﺿ ﻲﺘﺣ و ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ ﺮﺻﺎﻨﻋ نﺎﻴﻣ ﻦﻳا رد ﻪﮐ ﻦﻳا ﺖﻔﮕﺷ .ﺪﻨﻴﺑ ﻲﻤﻧ و ﻩﺪﻳد ﻲﻤﻧ دﻮﺧ رد ﻲﻣﻮﻤﻋ ةﺮﺘﺴﮔ رد ار ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ نﺁ حﺮﻃ و نﺁ ﻪﺑ
و ﺖﺳرد ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ و نﻮﺘﻣ ،ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا و ﻲﻨﻳد بادﺁ ،ﺪﻳﺎﻘﻋ ،رﺎﮑﻓا ﺎﺑ ار مدﺮﻣ و ﺪﻨﮐ ﻖﻴﻘﺤﺗ ﻪﻔﻳﺎﻃ ﻦﻳا ﻩرﺎﺑ رد ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻩداد ﻩزﺎﺟا دﻮﺧ ﻪﺑ يﺮﮕﺸهوﮋﭘ ﺮﺘﻤﮐ نارود ﻦﻳا رد ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳﺎﭘﺮﻳد و ﻩدﺮﺘﺴﮔ تﻮﮑﻳﺎﺑ و رﻮﺴﻧﺎﺳ
ور ﻦﻳا زا .ﺪﻧا ﻩدﺮﮐ يزﺎﺑ ﻲﺸﻘﻧ ﻪﭼ ناﺮﻳا ﺮﺻﺎﻌﻣ ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ رد و ﺪﻨﻳﻮﮔ ﻲﻣ ﻪﭼ و ﺪﻨﺘﺴﻴﮐ نﺎﻨﻳا ﻪﮐ ﺪﻳﻮﮕﺑ ،يدﺎﻘﺘﻋا يﺎه ﻲﺘﺳردﺎﻧ و ﻲﺘﺳرد و ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳو ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ يﺎﻬﻟاﺪﺟ زا ياﺪﺟ و ﺪﻨﮐ ﺎﻨﺷﺁ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ و ﺖﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻊﻣﺎﺟ
دﻮﺟو ناﺮﻳا رد ﻪﻨﻴﻣز ﻦﻳا رد دﻮﺼﻘﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻲﻓاو و دﺎﻤﺘﻋا درﻮﻣ و ﺖﺳرد و بﻮﺘﮑﻣ ﻊﺑﺎﻨﻣ ﺎﺳﺎﺳا و ﺖﺳا ﻪﻧﻮﮕﭼ ﻲﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺪﻳﺎﻘﻋ و ﻦﻳد ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨﻧاد¬ﻲﻤﻧ ﻲﺘﺳرد ﻪﺑ ﺰﻴﻧ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ناﺮﮕﺸهوﮋﭘ ﻲﺘﺣ يدﺎﻋ مدﺮﻣ ﺎﻬﻨﺗ ﻪﻧ زوﺮﻣا
ﻪﺑ .ﺪﻧراﺪﻧ ﻢه نﺪﻳد شزرا ﻲﺘﺣ ﺎﻬﻨﻳا زا يرﺎﻴﺴﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﺖﺳد رد ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ رﻮﮐ تﺎﺒﺼﻌﺗ ﺎﺑ ﻩاﺮﻤه و ﻲﻤﻠﻋ ﺮﻴﻏ و ﻪﻳﺎﻣ ﻲﺑ ﺎﺒﻟﺎﻏ و لﻮﻤﻌﻣ يﺎه ﻲﺴﻳﻮﻧ ﻪﻳدر ﺪهاﻮﺨﺑ نﺎﺘﻟد ﺎﺗ ﻞﺑﺎﻘﻣ رد .ﺖﺳا ﮎﺪﻧا رﺎﻴﺴﺑ ﺎﻳ و دراﺪﻧ



1 of 3


8/18/2010 12:38 PM

Iran Press Watch ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و ﻖﺣ مﺎﻧ ﻪﺑ « ﯽﺳرﺎﻓ » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa/post/267/print/



ﺎﻣ رﻮﺸﮐ ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ زا ﻲﺸﺨﺑ رﺎﺟﺎﻗ ﺮﺼﻋ ناﺮﻳا رد ﺖﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ داﺪﺧر لﺎﺣ ﺮه ﻪﺑ .ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﻧﺎﺳر ﺐﻴﺳﺁ ﺰﻴﻧ ناﺮﻳا رد ﺶهوﮋﭘ رﺎﮐ و تﺎﻋﻼﻠﻃا دازﺁ نﺎﻳﺮﺟ ﻪﺑ ﻲﺘﺣ ناﺮﻳا رد نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ رﻮﺴﻧﺎﺳ و تﻮﮑﻳﺎﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﺳر¬ﻲﻣ ﺮﻈﻧ
.دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ ﻩدﺮﻤﺷ ناﺮﻳا ﻦﻴﻣزﺮﺳ ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا ﻲﻨﻳد و ﻲﻣﻮﻤﻋ ﺦﻳرﺎﺗ زا يا ﻩرﺎﭘ ﺖﺧﺎﻨﺷ ،نﺁ ﻪﻧﺎﻓﺮﻃ ﻲﺑ و ﻲﻤﻠﻋ و ﺖﺳرد ﺖﺧﺎﻨﺷو ﺖﺳا
ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ناﺮﮕﺸهوﮋﭘ و ناﺮﮑﻔﻨﺷور ﻩﺪﻬﻋ ﺮﺑ ﺲﮐﺮه زا ﺶﻴﺑ و ﺰﻴﭼ ﺮه زا ﺶﻴﭘ ﺖﻴﻟﺆﺴﻣ ﻦﻳا ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻦﺷور و دﻮﺷ ﻩداد نﺎﻳﺎﭘ تﻮﮑﻳﺎﺑ و تﻮﮑﺳ و رﻮﺴﻧﺎﺳ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﻴﺳر نﺁ ﺖﻗو ﻪﮐ ﺪﻳﺎﻤﻧ¬ﻲﻣ ﻦﻴﻨﭼ لﺎﺣ
،ﺪﻨﺷﻮﮑﺑ ﻩوﺮﮔ ﻦﻳا ﻩﺪﺷ ﻎﻳرد قﻮﻘﺣ ﻦﻴﻣﺄﺗ ياﺮﺑ نﺎﺷ ﻲﻗﻼﺧا و ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا ﺪﻬﻌﺗ يﺎﻀﺘﻘﻣ ﻪﺑ ﺪﻳﺎﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨﺘﺴه يﺮﺸﺑ قﻮﻘﺣ و ﻩاﻮﺨﻳدازﺁ و تاﺮﮐﻮﻣد ﺮﺻﺎﻨﻋ و ناﺮﮑﻔﻨﺷور ﻩﺎﮕﻧﺁ و ﺪﻨهد نﺎﻳﺎﭘ ﻲﺸهوﮋﭘ ءﻼﺧ و ﺮﻘﻓ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ
ﻞﺻا سﺎﺳاﺮﺑ .ﺖﺳا ﺎﻬﻧﺎﺴﻧا يﺮﺑاﺮﺑ ﻞﺻا ﺮﺑ ﺮﺸﺑ قﻮﻘﺣ ﻩﮋﻳﻮﺑ و ﻲﺳاﺮﮐﻮﻣد سﺎﺳا .دراد دﻮﺟو ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا ﺎﻳ و ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ ماﺮﻣ و ﮏﻠﺴﻣ و ﻦﻳد ﺮه ﺎﺑ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ناﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ مﺎﻤﺗ درﻮﻣ رد ﺪﻬﻌﺗ ﻦﻳا ﻪﮐ ﻪﻧﻮﮔ نﺎﻤه
.ﺖﺴﻴﻧ ﺮﺗ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا يﺮﮕﻳد زا ﺲﮐ ﭻﻴه ﻖﻄﻨﻣ ﻦﻳا رد و ﺖﺳا ﺮﺑاﺮﺑ ﺮﮕﻳد ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ﺮه ﺎﺑ ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ ﻲﮔﺪﻧز ناﺮﻳا ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ يﺎﻴﻓاﺮﻐﺟ بﻮﭼرﺎﻬﭼ رد و ﺖﺳا ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ﻪﮐ ﻲﺴﮐ ﺮه ﺮﺸﺑ ﻲﻌﻴﺒﻃ و ﻲﺗاذ قﻮﻘﺣ و ﻲﺳاﺮﮐﻮﻣد
.ﻢﻳﺮﺑ¬ﻲﻣ ﺮﺳ ﻪﺑ ﻪﻃوﺮﺸﻣ زا ﺶﻴﭘ نارود رد زﻮﻨه ﻞﻤﻋ رد ﺎﻣا ﻢﻳا ﻪﺘﻓﺮﻳﺬﭘ ﺖﻴﻃوﺮﺸﻣ نﺎﻣز زا ﺎﻣ اﺮهﺎﻇ ار ﻖﻄﻨﻣ ﻦﻳا
نﺎﻬﻴﻘﻓ و نﺎﻤﻟﺎﻋ ﺖﻣﺪﺧ ﻂﻘﻓ ،مﻮﺸﺑ نﺁ دراو ﻢﻧاﻮﺗ ﻲﻤﻧ نﻮﻨﮐا ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا رﺎﻴﺴﺑ ﻪﺸﻗﺎﻨﻣ و ﺚﺤﺑ يﺎﺟ درﻮﻣ ﻦﻳا رد .ﺪﺷﺎﺑ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ يﺎه روﺎﺑ زا ﻲﺧﺮﺑ رد ﻲﺳﺎﺳا ﻞﮑﺸﻣ ﻪﮐ ﺪﺳر¬ﻲﻣ ﺮﻈﻧ ﻪﺑ ﻲﻣﻮﻤﻋ ﮓﻨهﺮﻓ ﻩزﻮﺣ رد
اﻮﺘﻓ ﻪﺑ نﺎﻣز و ﻢﻠﻋ و ﻞﻘﻋ ﺖﻳﺎﻋر ﺎﺑ ﻪﻧاﺪﻬﺘﺠﻣ و ﺪﻨﻨﮐ ﻞﻣﺄﺗ درﻮﻣ ﻦﻳا رد ﻲﻟﻮﺻا دﺎﻬﺘﺟا و ﻲﻬﻘﻓ بﺎﻧ ﺪﻋاﻮﻗ ﺪﻌﺑ ﻪﻠﺣﺮﻣ رد و ﻲﻣﻼﺳا ﻩﺎﮔﺪﻳد تﺎﻴﻠﮐ بﻮﭼ رﺎﻬﭼ رد ﻲﻤﻠﻋ ﺪﻬﻌﺗ يﺎﻀﺘﻘﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﻢﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ دﺎﻬﻨﺸﻴﭘ مﺮﺘﺤﻣ
و ﻲﺤﻴﺴﻣ نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﻢﮑﺣ ﺎﺑ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻲﻬﻘﻓ ﻢﮑﺣ ﺮﮕﻣ ؟ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ ﺪﺗﺮﻣ ﺖﻣﺎﻴﻗ زورﺎﺗ ﺪﻌﺑ يﺎﻬﻠﺴﻧ ﻲﻬﻘﻓ ﻞﻴﻟد ﻪﭼ ﻪﺑو اﺮﭼ ،ﺪﻧا ﻩدﻮﺑ ﺪﺗﺮﻣ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺖﺴﺨﻧ ﻞﺴﻧ ﺎﺿﺮﻓ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨهد ﺦﺳﺎﭘ يﺪﺟ رﻮﻃ ﻪﺑ ﺶﺳﺮﭘ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ ﻪﻠﻤﺟ زا .ﺪﻨﺳﺮﺑ
ﻲﮔﺪﻧز ﻲﻳﺎﻴﻧد رد ﺎﻣ زوﺮﻣا ﻲﻬﮕﻧاو .دوﺮﮔ ﻲﻣ ﻲﻨﻳد¬ﻲﺑ ﺎﺳﺎﺳا ﺎﻳ و ﻦﻳد ماﺪﮐ ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻤﻧ ﻲﻗﺮﻓ ددﺮﮔ¬ﻲﻣ ﺮﺑ مﻼﺳا زا ﻲﺴﮐ ﻲﺘﻗو ﻪﮐ اﺮﭼ دراﺪﻧ يﺮﻴﺛﺄﺗ ندﻮﺑ بﺎﺘﮐ ﻞها نﺎﻴﻣ ﻦﻳا رد ؟دراد قﺮﻓ ﻩﺪﺷ يدﻮﻬﻳ ﺎﻳ
موﺮﺤﻣ ﺮﺑاﺮﺑ قﻮﻘﺣ ﻦﻳا زا يﺮﺸﺑ تﺎﻨﻴﻌﺗ ﺮﮕﻳد و ﺐهﺬﻣ و داﮋﻧ و ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ و ﺮﮑﻓ ﻞﻴﻟد ﻪﺑ ار يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ ﭻﻴه ناﻮﺗ ﻲﻤﻧ و دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ ﻩدﺮﻤﺷ ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا ﻂﺑاور ﻢﻴﻈﻨﺗ ﻦﻳدﺎﻴﻨﺑ ﻞﺻا ﺎﻬﻧﺎﺴﻧا ﻲﺗاذ قﻮﻘﺣ يﺮﺑاﺮﺑ ﻪﮐ ﻢﻴﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ
ترﻮﺻ ﻦﻳا رد ،ﺖﺳا ﻦﻴﻨﭼ ﺮﮔا ؟ﺪﻨﺸﻳﺪﻧا¬ﻲﻣ ﻪﻧﻮﮔ نﺎﻤه ﺎﻣ نﺎﻬﻴﻘﻓ زﻮﻨه رﺎﮔزور نﺁ زا نﺮﻗ ﮏﻳ زا ﺲﭘ ﺎﻳﺁ .قﻮﻘﺣ يوﺎﺴﺗ ﻪﻧ ﺖﺳا قﻮﻘﺣ ﺾﻴﻌﺒﺗ ﻞﺻا مﻼﺳا رد ﺖﻔﮔ ﻲﻣ يرﻮﻧ ﷲا ﻞﻀﻓ ﺦﻴﺷ يزور .دﺮﮐ
ﻩوﺮﮔ ﻦﻳا ﻲﻋﺮﺷ ﻢﮑﺣ ﻩرﺎﺑ رد ناﺪﻠﻘﻣ رﺮﮑﻣ يﺎه ﺶﺳﺮﭘ ﺮﺑاﺮﺑ رد ﺖﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ رﺎﮐ زﺎﻏﺁ نﺎﻤه رد يرﺎﺼﻧا ﻲﻀﺗﺮﻣ ﻢﻈﻋا ﺦﻴﺷ يرﺎﮔزور ؟ﺖﺳا ﺎﻨﻌﻣ ﻪﭼ ﻪﺑ ﻲﻣﻼﺳا ﺖﻌﻳﺮﺷ ندﻮﺑ ﻪﻧﻻدﺎﻋ و مﻼﺳا ندﻮﺑ ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا يﺎﻋدا
و ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺶﻳﺪﻧا ﺮﮔد يﺎﻬﻧﺎﻳﺮﺟ و داﺮﻓا ﻩرﺎﺑ رد يدﺎﻬﺘﺟا و ﻲﻤﻠﻋ ﺶهوﮋﭘ ﺎﻤﻠﻋ تاﺮﻀﺣ ﻪﮐ ﻢﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ دﺎﻬﻨﺸﻴﭘ .( نﻮﻤﻀﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻞﻘﻧ ) ﺪﻨﮐ ﺮﻈﻧ رﺎﻬﻇا ﺪﻧاﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻤﻧ دراﺪﻧ ﻪﻔﻳﺎﻃ ﻦﻳا زا ﻲﻋﻼﻃا نﻮﭼ ﻪﮐ ﺖﻔﮔ ﻪﻧﻻﺆﺴﻣ
ﻪﮐ يرﺎﮐ .ﺪﻨهﺪﺑ اﺮﺟا ﻞﺑﺎﻗ و عﺎﻓد ﻞﺑﺎﻗ و ﺮﻳﺬﭘ دﺮﺧ و ﻪﻧﻻدﺎﻋ يﺎﻬﺨﺳﺎﭘ ﻲﻨﻳد تﺎﻤﮑﺤﻣ ﻪﺑ يﺪﻨﺒﻳﺎﭘ ﻦﻴﻋ رد دﻮﺧ رﺎﮔزور يﺎه ﺶﺳﺮﭘ ﻪﺑ و ﺪﻨهد راﺮﻗ رﺎﮐ رﻮﺘﺳد رد ﻪﺘﺷﺬﮔ زا ﺮﺗ يﺪﺟ ار ﺖﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻩﮋﻳﻮﺑ و ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ
ﺮﻴﻏ ار ﺎﻬﻧﺁ قﻮﻘﺣ ﺮﮑﻳد و نﺎﺟ و لاﻮﻣا و ﻩدﺮﮐ عﺎﻓد ناﺮﻳا نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ و ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا قﻮﻘﺣ زا بﻮﺘﮑﻣ ﻞﮑﺷ ﻪﺑ و ﺎﺤﻳﺮﺻ نﺎﺸﻳا ﻪﮐ ﻦﻳا .ﺪﻧا ﻩدﺮﮐ زﺎﻏﺁ يﺮﻴﻟد ﺎﺑ يﺮﻈﺘﻨﻣ ﷲا ﺖﻳا ﻪﻠﻤﺟ زا ناﺪﻬﺘﺠﻣ زا ﻲﺧﺮﺑ
ﺮﺑ يﺪﻌﺗ ﻩار ﺰﻴﻧ ﻞﻤﻋ رد و ﺪﻳاﺰﻓا¬ﻲﻣ تﻼﮑﺸﻣ ﺮﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻤﻧ ﻞﺟ ار ﻲﻠﮑﺸﻣ ﺎﻬﻨﺗ ﻪﻧ بﺎﺑ ﻦﻳا رد ﻲﺗوﺎﻔﺗ ﻲﺑ و تﻮﮑﺳ لﺎﺣ ﺮه ﻪﺑ .ﺖﺳا ﻲﻌﻴﺷ دﺎﻬﺘﺟا و ﻪﻘﻓ بﻮﭼ رﺎﻬﭼ رد ﻲﻤﻬﻣ مﺎﮔ ،ﺪﻧا ﻪﺘﺴﻧاد ضﺮﻌﺗ لﻮﺒﻗ
.ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ زﺎﺑ ار نﺎﻨﻃﻮﻤه زا يرﺎﻤﺷ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ قﻮﻘﺣ
ﻩﺪﻋو زﻮﻨه و ﺪﻨﺘﺴه يﻮﻠﻬﭘ ﺪﺒﺘﺴﻣ ﻢﻳژر ﻪﻴﻠﻋ نازرﺎﺒﻣ زا مﺎﻈﻧ ﻲﻠﺻا ناﺮﺒهر زﻮﻨه و ﻪﺘﺷﺬﮕﻧ بﻼﻘﻧا زا ﻩﺪﻣﺁﺮﺑ مﺎﻈﻧ ﻦﻳا ﺮﻤﻋ زا لﺎﺳ 30 زﻮﻨه .مراد ﻲﻣﻼﺳا يرﻮﻬﻤﺟ مﺎﻈﻧ نﻻﺆﺴﻣ ﺎﺑ ﺰﻴﻧ ﻲﻨﺨﺳ ﺎﺠﻨﻳا رد ﺎﻣاو
زا ﻩدﺎﻔﺘﺳا و ﻲﻗﻮﻘﺣ ﺮﻈﻧ زاناﺮﻳا ﺖﻠﻣ نﺎﻴﻣ ردﻲﻣﻼﺳا لﺪﻋ مﺎﻈﻧ رد دﻮﺑ ﺎﻨﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻴﻳﻮﮕﺑ مدﺮﻣ ﻪﺑ ،ﺖﺳا ﻪﺘﻓﺮﻧ ﺎهدﺎﻳ زا نازﺎﺘﺸﻴﭘ ﺮﮕﻳد و بﻼﻘﻧا ﺪﻴﻘﻓ ﺮﺒهر ﻪﻠﻴﺳﻮﺑ يداﺪﺒﺘﺳا ﺪﺿ ﻩزرﺎﺒﻣ نارود رد ﻩﺪﺷ ﻩداد يﺎه
و تﺎﻧﺎﮑﻣا مﺎﻤﺗ و ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ دازﺁ ﺖﻳﻻو ﻦﻳا رد بوذ و ﻪﻴﻘﻓ ﻪﻘﻠﻄﻣ ﺖﻳﻻو ﻪﺑ ﺪﻘﺘﻌﻣ ﻲﻣﺎﻣا ﻂﺧ ﻲﻌﻴﺷ نﺎﻧﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﻂﻘﻓ ﻪﮐ دﻮﺑ ﺎﻨﺑ ﻢﺳﺮﭘ¬ﻲﻣ ﺺﺨﺸﻣ رﻮﻃ ﻪﺑ ؟ﺪﺷﺎﺑ ﺾﻴﻌﺒﺗ و ﺰﻳﺎﻤﺗ و توﺎﻔﺗ ﺎﻬﺘﺻﺮﻓ و ﻲﻠﻣ تﺎﻧﺎﮑﻣا
،ﺪﻴهد¬ﻲﻣ ﻲﻔﻨﻣ ﺦﺳﺎﭘ ﻦﻣ يﺎﻬﺸﺳﺮﭘ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ ﺮﻈﻧ ﻢﻟﺎﻋ رد ﺎﻤﺷ ﻪﮐ مراد ﻦﻴﻘﻳ ؟ﺪﻴﺘﻔﮕﻧ مدﺮﻣ ﻪﺑ ار ﻦﻳا بﻼﻘﻧا و ﻩزرﺎﺒﻣ نارود نﺎﻤه رد اﺮﭼ دﻮﺑ ﻦﻴﻨﭼ ﺮﮔا ؟ﺪﺷﺎﺑﻪﻴﺟﺎﻧ قﺮﻓ ﻦﻴﻤه ﻖﻠﻄﻣ رﺎﻴﺘﺧا رد رﻮﺸﮐ يﺎﻬﺘﺻﺮﻓ
نﺎﺘﺨﺳﺎﭘ ﺮﮔا و ؟ﺪﻴهد ﺖﺒﺜﻣ ﺦﺳﺎﭘ ﺶﺳﺮﭘ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ ﺪﻴﻧاﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻣ ؟ﺖﺳا راﺮﻗﺮﺑ ﺎﻤﺷ ﺖﻳرﺪﻣ ﺖﺤﺗ مﺎﻈﻧ رد ﻲﺒﺴﻧ رﻮﻃ ﻪﺑ ﻲﺘﺣ و نﺁ ﻊﻣﺎﺟ و ﺖﺳرد يﺎﻨﻌﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻲﻗﻮﻘﺣ تاوﺎﺴﻣ ﺮﺿﺎﺣ لﺎﺣ رد ﻪﮐ ﺪﻴﻳﺎﻣﺮﻔﺑ ترﻮﺻ ﻦﻳا رد
.ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ ﺐﻳﺬﮑﺗ ار يﻮﻋد ﻦﻳا رﺎﮑﻧا ﻞﺑﺎﻗ ﺮﻴﻏ و ﻦﺷور ﻩاﻮﮔ و ﺪهﺎﺷ ناراﺰه ؟ ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ روﺎﺑ ﻲﺴﮐ ﺪﻴﻨﮐ ﻲﻣ ﺮﮑﻓ ﺪﺷﺎﺑ ﺖﺒﺜﻣ
و ﻲﺗاذ قﻮﻘﺣ ﻪﻳﺮﻈﻧ دﺎﻴﻨﺑ ﺮﺑ ﻲﻗﻮﻘﺣ تاوﺎﺴﻣ و يﺮﺑاﺮﺑ ﻞﺻا ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ ﻖﻘﺤﻣ ﻲﺗرﻮﺻ رد ﺪﻨﻠﺑ نﺎﻣرﺁ ود ﻦﻳا و دﻮﺑ ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و يدازﺁ ياﺮﺑ ﻪﻃوﺮﺸﻣ ﺶﺒﻨﺟ مواﺪﺗ رد ناﺮﻳا بﻼﻘﻧا ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻦﺷور لﺎﺣ ﺮه ﻪﺑ
ﺎﻳ و ﺖﻓﺮﮔ ﻩﺪﻳدﺎﻧ ار نﺁ ناﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻤﻧ و ﺖﺳا مﺎﻬﺑا ﻲﺑ و ﻲﺳﺎﺳا ﻩﺪﻋﺎﻗ ﮏﻳ ﻦﻳا .دﻮﺷ ﺖﻳﺎﻋر ﻼﻣﺎﮐﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ناﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا و يدﺮﻓ ﻲﮔﺪﻧز يﺎه ﻪﺻﺮﻋ مﺎﻤﺗ رد ﻲﻨﻴﻌﺗ و ﺾﻴﻌﺒﺗ ﻦﻳﺮﺘﻤﮐ نوﺪﺑ نﺎﺴﻧا ﻲﻌﻴﺒﻃ
و ﺪﻴﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ حﺮﻄﻣ اربﺎﺘﮐ ﻞها ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﻦﻣ ﺮﺑاﺮﺑ رد ﺎﻌﻄﻗ ؟ﺖﺳﺎﺠﮐ ناﺮﻳا ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ رد ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ﻩوﺮﮔ ﻦﻳا قﻮﻘﺣ ؟ﺪﻨﺘﺴﻴﻧناﺮﻳا ﺖﻠﻣ رﺎﻤﺷ رد ناﺮﻳا ﻲﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﺖﻋﺎﻤﺟ ﺎﻳﺁ ﻪﮐ ﻢﺳﺮﭘ ﻲﻣ لﺎﺣ .دﺮﮐ ﻪﻴﺟﻮﺗ
و ﻞﻣﺎﮐ تاوﺎﺴﻣ ﻞﺻا ﺎﺑ ضرﺎﻌﺗ رد ارﺎﮑﺷﺁ ﻪﮐ اﺮﭼ دﻮﺑ ﻩﺎﺒﺘﺷا ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ رد ﻩﺪﺷ رﺮﻘﻣ ﻪﻘﻓ رد ﺎﻬﻧﺁ ياﺮﺑ ﻪﮐ ﻲﺗارﺮﻘﻣ و بﺎﺘﮐ¬ﻞها عﻮﺿﻮﻣ حﺮﻃ ﻻوا :ﻢﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ ضﺮﻋ ﺦﺳﺎﭘ رد .نﻮﻧﺎﻗ رد نﺁ سﺎﮑﻌﻧا
ﻞها ﺮﻴﻏ ياﺮﺑ ﺎﺳﺎﺳا ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ رد ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻦﻳا ﺮﺗ ﻲﺳﺎﺳا لﺎﮑﺷا ﺎﻴﻧﺎﺛ .ﺪﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ موﺮﺤﻣ نﺎﺷ ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا ﻢﻠﺴﻣ قﻮﻘﺣ زا ار ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ناﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ زا ﻲﻬﺟﻮﺗ ﻞﺑﺎﻗ رﺎﻤﺷ ﺎﻨﺜﺘﺳا ﻦﻳا و ﺖﺳا ﮏﻴﺗاﺮﮐﻮﻣد يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ قﻮﻘﺣ
ار ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ عﻮﻧﺮه و ﻩﺪﺷ ﺢﻳﺮﺼﺗ ﻲﻗﻮﻘﺣ تاوﺎﺴﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ لﻮﺻا زا ﻲﺧﺮﺑ رد ﻲﺘﻗو ﺎﺜﻟﺎﺛ .ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﺸﻧ حﺮﻄﻣ يا ﻩﺪﺷ ﻒﻳﺮﻌﺗ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ قﻮﻘﺣ ( ﺎﻬﻧﺁ لﺎﺜﻣا و نﺎﻨﻳد¬ﻲﺑ ،نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ،ﻪﻳﺪﻳز ،ﻪﻴﻠﻴﻋﺎﻤﺳا ) بﺎﺘﮐ
زا صﺎﺧ ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ و ﻦﻳد ﻦﺘﺷاد ﻞﻴﻟد ﻪﺑ ﺎﻓﺮﺻ و ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ رادرﻮﺧ ﺮﺑ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ يﺎﻬﻳدازﺁ زا ﺪﻨﻧاﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻣ بﺎﺘﮐ ﻞها ﺮﻴﻏ ﺎﻳ و ﻲﻌﻴﺷ نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﺎﻨﻌﻣ ناﺪﺑ ،ﺖﺳا ﻩدﺮﮐ مﻼﻋا عﻮﻨﻤﻣ ار ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ ﺶﻴﺘﻔﺗ ﺎﻳ و ﻪﺘﺴﻧاد دازﺁ
ﻦﻬﭘ ﺶﻳر و ﻪﺳﻮﮐ قاﺪﺼﻣ ﻪﮐ ﻦﻳا .دراﺪﻧار ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ ﻎﻴﻠﺒﺗ و لﺎﻐﺘﺷا و نﺪﻧاﻮﺧ سرد ﻖﺣ ﺎﻣا ﺖﺳا دازﺁ دﻮﺧ ﺪﻳﺎﻘﻋ رد ﻩوﺮﮔ ﺎﻳ و دﺮﻓ نﻼﻓ ﻢﻴﻳﻮﮕﺑ ﻪﮐ دراﺪﻧ ﺎﻨﻌﻣ ترﻮﺻ ﻦﻳا رد .ﺪﻧﻮﺸﻧ موﺮﺤﻣ ﻲﻋﺎﻤﺘﺟا قﻮﻘﺣ
ﺮه ﻪﺑ ،ﻢﻳرﺬﮕﺑ ﺚﺣﺎﺒﻣ ﻦﻳا ﻪﻤه زا ﺎﻌﺑار .ﺪﻨهﺪﺑ ار نﺁ ناوﺎﺗ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ناﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ ﺪﻳﺎﺒﻧ و ﺖﺳا ﺎﻤﺷ ﻞﮑﺸﻣ ،دراد دﻮﺟو ضرﺎﻌﺗ نرﺪﻣ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ قﻮﻘﺣ و ﻪﻘﻓ ﻞﻣﺎﻌﺗ رد ﺎﻳ و ﻲﺳﺎﺳا نﻮﻧﺎﻗ لﻮﺻا رد ﺮﮔا لﺎﺣ .ﺖﺳا
ﺪﻨﻨﮐ ﺖﻴﻨﻣا سﺎﺴﺣا ﻲﻣﻼﺳا مﺎﻈﻧ رد نﺎﻨﻳا ﺪﻳﺎﺒﻧ ﺎﻳﺁ ؟ﺖﺴﻴﻧ قدﺎﺻ ﺎﻬﻧا ﻩرﺎﺑ ردﻦﻣﺄﺘﺴﻣ ﻪﺑ طﻮﺑﺮﻣ تارﺮﻘﻣ ﺎﻳﺁ ،ﺪﻨﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ ﻲﮔﺪﻧز رﻮﺸﮐ ﻦﻳا ﻲﺘﻣﻮﮑﺣ مﺎﻈﻧ ﻩﺎﻨﭘ رد و ﻲﻣﻼﺳا ﻪﻌﻣﺎﺟ رد زوﺮﻣا ناﺮﮕﻳد و نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ لﺎﺣ
ﻲﺘﺣ ﻩراﻮﻤه ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﺖﺳار ﺎﻳﺁ ؟ﺪﻧا موﺮﺤﻣ ﻩﺎﮕﺸﻧاد و سراﺪﻣ رد ﻞﻴﺼﺤﺗ زا نﺎﻧﺁ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﺖﺳرد ﺎﻳﺁ ؟ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ رادرﻮﺧ ﺮﺑ لﺎﻐﺘﺷا و سرد و ﻲﮔﺪﻧز تﺎﻧﺎﮑﻣا ﻞﻗاﺪﺣ زا و ﺪﺷﺎﺑ ظﻮﻔﺤﻣ نﺎﺷ يوﺮﺑﺁ و نﺎﺟ و لﺎﻣ و
ناراﺪﻨﻳد و ﻦﻳد دﻮﺳ ﻪﺑ ﺎهرﺎﺘﻓر عﻮﻧ ﻦﻳا ﻪﮐ دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ رﻮﺼﺗ ﺎﻳﺁ ؟درﺎﻤﺷ¬ﻲﻣ زﺎﺠﻣ ار ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا ﺮﻴﻏ و ﺖﺷز يﺎهرﺎﺘﻓر ﻦﻴﻨﭼ ﻲﻬﻘﻓ ﻦﺷور ﻩﺪﻋﺎﻗ ماﺪﮐ و ﻲﻨﻳد نﻮﻧﺎﻗ ماﺪﮐ ؟ﺪﻧراﺪﻧ ﺖﻴﻨﻣا نﺎﺘﺳرﻮﮔ رد نﺎﺸﻳﺎه ﻩدﺮﻣ
؟ﺖﺳا
ﻪﺑ ﻂﻘﻓ ،ﻢﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻤﻧ ﺮﻈﻧ رﺎﻬﻇا ﻪﻨﻴﻣز ﻦﻳا رد اﺬﻟ و ﻲﺿﺎﻗ ﻪﻧ و ﻢﺘﺴه ﻮﺟزﺎﺑ ﻪﻧ ﻦﻣ .ﺪﻨﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ حﺮﻄﻣ ناﺮﮕﻳد ﺎﻳ و ﺶﻳوارد و نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ درﻮﻣ رد نﻻﺆﺴﻣ ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻲﺗﺎﻣﺎﻬﺗا نﺁ و ﺪﻧﺎﻣ¬ﻲﻣ ﻲﻗﺎﺑ ﻪﻟﺄﺴﻣ ﮏﻳ ﻂﻘﻓ ﺎﺠﻨﻳارد
ﺮه ﺎﺗ ﺪﻴﻨﮐ راﺰﮔﺮﺑ ﻲﻗﻮﻘﺣ ﻦﻳزاﻮﻣ ﻞﻣﺎﮐ ﺖﻳﺎﻋر ﺎﺑ و ﻪﻧﻻدﺎﻋ ﻂﻳاﺮﺷ ﮏﻳ رد ار نﺎﻤﻬﺘﻣ ﻩﺎﮔداد ﻢﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ ﺎﺿﺎﻘﺗ ،ﻢﻨﻴﺑ ﻲﻣ مﺎﻬﺗا ضﺮﻌﻣ رد ار مرﻮﺸﮐ و ﻦﻳد ارﺎﮑﺷﺁ ﻪﮐ ،ﻩاﻮﺧ ﺮﻴﺧ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ﮏﻳو نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﮏﻳ ناﻮﻨﻋ
ﻪﻤﮑﺤﻣ و ﻲﻌﻄﻗ تاﺪﻨﺘﺴﻣ و ﻞﻳﻻد ﺪﻴﺘﺴه ﻲﻋﺪﻣ ﻪﮐ ﺎﻤﺷ .دﺮﮐ ﺪهاﻮﺨﻧ روﺎﺑ ارﺎﻤﺷ يﺎﻋدا جرﺎﺧ و ﻞﺧاد رد ﺲﮐ ﭻﻴه ،ﺪﻴﻨﮑﻧ ﻦﻴﻨﭼ ﺮﮔا .دﻮﺷ يﺮﻴﮔﻮﻠﺟ ﻩدﺎﻔﺘﺳا ءﺆﺳ عﻮﻧ ﺮه زا ﻻﺎﻤﺘﺣا و فﺮﻃ ﺮﺑ ﺪﻳدﺮﺗ و ﻪﻬﺒﺷ عﻮﻧ
؟ﺪﻴﻨﮐ لﺎﺒﻘﺘﺳا ﻲﻧﻮﻧﺎﻗ و ﻲﻨﻠﻋ ﻩﺎﮔداد ﻞﻴﮑﺸﺗ زا ﺪﻳﺎﺒﻧ اﺮﭼ ،ﺪﻳراد ﺪﻨﺴﭘ
ﻂﻘﻓ و دﻮﺸﺑ ﺎهرﺎﮐ ﻦﻴﻤه ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻩدﻮﺑ راﺮﻗ ﺰﻴﻧ لوا زا ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧرﺎﺸﻔﺑ يﺎﭘ يﻮﻋد ﻦﻳا ﺮﺑ ضﺮﻐﻣ ﺎﻳ و ﻞهﺎﺟ يرﺎﻤﺷ و دوﺮﺑ لاﺆﺳ ﺮﻳز ناﺮﻳا ﻲﻣﻼﺳا بﻼﻘﻧا و مﻼﺳا ﻪﮐ ﺖﺳا ﻩﺪﺷ ﺐﺟﻮﻣ ﺎهرﺎﺘﻓر عﻮﻧ ﻦﻳا ﻪﮐ ﺎﺠﻧﺁ زا
نﺎﻣز نﺁ رد ( ﻦﻣ نﻮﭼ ﻲﻧاﺮﮕﻳد و ) ﻦﻣ ﻪﮐ ﻢهﺪﺑ تدﺎﻬﺷ ﻪﻧﺎﻗدﺎﺻ ﺪﻳﺎﺑ ،دﻮﺷ¬ﻲﻣ طﻮﺑﺮﻣ ﻩﺎﺠﻨﭘ و ﻞﻬﭼ ﻪهد رد ﻲﺑﻼﻘﻧا نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﻲﻧﺎﺣور ﮏﻳ ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑ ﻦﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺎﺠﻧﺁ ﺎﺗ ،ﺪﻧداد يﺮﮕﻳد يﺎه ﻩﺪﻋو ﻲﺒﻳﺮﻓ ماﻮﻋ ياﺮﺑ



2 of 3


8/18/2010 12:38 PM

Iran Press Watch ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و ﻖﺣ مﺎﻧ ﻪﺑ « ﯽﺳرﺎﻓ » Print

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa/post/267/print/



ﺎﺑ ﺶﻴﺑ و ﻢﮐ ﻪﮐ دﻮﺑ ﻲﻟﺎﺣ رد ﻦﻳا .ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ موﺮﺤﻣ ﺮﺑاﺮﺑ ﻲﻧﺎﺴﻧا قﻮﻘﺣ زا نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﻲﺘﺣ و و نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ نﺎﺸﻳﺪﻧا ﺮﮔد و دﻮﺷ راﺮﻗﺮﺑ ﻲﻗﻮﻘﺣ ﺾﻴﻌﺒﺗ ﻲﻣﻼﺳا ﺖﻣﻮﮑﺣ مﺎﻈﻧ رد ﺖﺳا ﺎﻨﺑ ﻪﮐ ﻢﻳدﺮﮐ¬ﻲﻤﻧ ﺮﮑﻓ ﺰﮔﺮه
ﺎﺠﻳا رد .ﺪﺷ ﺪﻨهاﻮﺧ لﻮﺤﺘﻣ ﻩﺪﻧز و ﻲﻤﻠﻋ دﺎﻬﺘﺟا ﺎﺑ رﺎﮔزور ﻦﻳا رد اﺮﺟا ﻞﺑﺎﻗ ﺮﻴﻏ مﺎﮑﺣا و ﺪﻋاﻮﻗ ﻦﻳا ﻪﮐ مدﺮﮐ ﻲﻣ ﺮﮑﻓ ﺎﻣا مﺪﻳد ﻲﻤﻧ ار ﻊﻧاﻮﻣ و مدﻮﺑ ﺶﻳﺪﻧا ﻩدﺎﺳ ﺪﻳﺎﺷ .مدﻮﺑ ﺎﻨﺷﺁ ﺰﻴﻧ ﻲﻣﻼﺳا ﻪﻘﻓ و ﺖﻌﻳﺮﺷ
.ﻢﻳﻮﮔ¬ﻲﻣ زﺎﺑ زوﺮﻣا ﻞﺴﻧ ياﺮﺑ مﺎﻳا نﺁ زا ار دﻮﺧ ﺖﻴﻨهذ و سﺎﺴﺣا ﻩﺮﻃﺎﺧ ود نﺎﻴﺑ ﺎﺑ ﺎﻣا ﻢﻳﻮﮕﺑ ﻦﺨﺳ درﻮﻣ ﻦﻳا رد ﻦﻳا زا ﺶﻴﺑ ﻢﻧاﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻤﻧ
ﻪﺑ و ( سﺪﻘﻟا ةﺮﻴﻈﺣ ) ﻪﻘﻄﻨﻣ نﺁ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﻞﺤﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻪﻧﺎﺒﺷ ﻪﻠﻤﺣ ياﺮﺑ ﻦﻣ زا و ﺪﻧﺪﻣﺁ ﻦﻣ نﺪﻳد ﻪﺑ ناﻮﺟ ود ﻲﺒﺷ .مدﻮﺑ ﻩدﺎﺑﺁ دﺎﻐﺻ رد ﻲﻐﻴﻠﺒﺗ ﺮﻔﺳ ﮏﻳ ياﺮﺑ ﺮﻔﺻ ﻩﺎﻣ مﺎﻳا ﺖﺒﺳﺎﻨﻣ ﻪﺑ 57 ﻩﺎﻣ يد ﻂﺳاوا رد
مﺎﻤﺗ ﺎﺑ نﺁ زا ﺲﭘ .ﻢﺘﺷاﺪﻧ ﻞﻤﻌﻟا ﺲﮑﻋ و ﻢﻠﮑﺗ ترﺪﻗ ﻲﺗﺎﻈﺣا ﺎﺗ ﻪﮐ مﺪﺷ ﮎﺎﻨﻤﻴﺑ لﺎﺣ ﻦﻴﻋ رد و ﺖﺣارﺎﻧ نﺎﻨﭼ ﺐﻴﺠﻋ و ﻩﺮﻈﺘﻨﻣ ﺮﻴﻏ دﺎﻬﻨﺸﻴﭘ ﻦﻳا زا .ﺪﻨﺘﺳاﻮﺧ ﻩزﺎﺟا نﺁ ﺐﻳﺮﺨﺗ ﺖﻳﺎﻬﻧ رد و ﺎﺠﻧﺁ دﺎﻨﺳا ندروﺁ ﺖﺳد
ﻦﻳد رد ﻪﻤه ﺖﺳا راﺮﻗ ﻪﮑﻠﺑ دﺮﻴﮕﺑ راﺮﻗ رازﺁ درﻮﻣ شا ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ و ﻦﻳد ﺮﻃﺎﺧ ﻪﺑ ﻲﺴﮐ ﻲﻣﻼﺳا ﺖﻣﻮﮑﺣ رد ﺖﺴﻴﻧ راﺮﻗ ﻪﮐ مدﺮﮐ لﻻﺪﺘﺳا نﺎﻨﻳا ياﺮﺑ .مرادزﺎﺑ رﺎﮐ ﻦﻳا زا ار رﻮﺷﺮﭘ ناﻮﺟ ود نﺁ ﻪﮐ مﺪﻴﺷﻮﮐ اﻮﻗ
ﻩﺪﺷ ﻊﻧﺎﻗ اﺮهﺎﻇ .ﻢﺘﺷاد زﺎﺑ نﺎﺸﺘﺳردﺎﻧ رﺎﮐ زا ار نﺎﺘﺳود ﻦﻳا راﺮﺻا و ﺶهاﻮﺧ ﻲﺘﺣ و لﻻﺪﺘﺳا ﺎﺑ .مدﺮﮐ دﺎﻨﺘﺳا بﻼﻘﻧا ﻲﻨﻳد ﺮﺒهر ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑ ﻲﻨﻴﻤﺧ مﺎﻣا نﺎﻨﺨﺳ ﻪﺑ مراد دﺎﻳ ﻪﺑ ﻩﮋﻳﻮﺑ .ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ دازﺁ دﻮﺧ ﺮﮑﻓ و ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋو
ﻪﺘﺒﻟا .مدﺮﮐ نﺎﺸﺘﻣﻼﻣ ﺖﺨﺳ .ﺪﻨﺘﺴه ﻪﭼ ﻢﻨﻴﺒﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧداد ﻦﻣ ﻪﺑ قاروا ﻲﺘﺸﻣ .ﺪﻧا ﻩدﺮﮐ يرادﻮﺧ ﺐﻳﺮﺨﺗ زا ﻲﻟو ﺪﻧا ﻩدروﺁ ﺖﺳد ﻪﺑ ار ﻲﻗاروا و ﻪﺘﻓر ﺮﻈﻧ درﻮﻣ ﻞﺤﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨﺘﻔﮔ و ﺪﻧﺪﻣﺁ ﺪﻌﺑ ﺐﺷود ﺪﻨﭼﺮه .ﺪﻨﺘﻓر و
.ﺪﻧدﻮﺒﻧ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﻎﻴﻠﺒﺗ قاروا و ﺖﻳﻮﻀﻋ ﻖﺣ ﺪﻴﺳر يﺎﻬﻀﺒﻗ ﻲﺧﺮﺑ ﺰﺟ يﺰﻴﭼ ﺰﻴﻧ ﺎه ﻩرﺎﭘ ﺬﻏﺎﮐ نﺁ ﻪﮐ ﻢﻳﻮﮕﺑ
ﺮﻬﺷ ﻲﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﻌﻣﺎﺟ ﻩﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻧ ار دﻮﺧ و ﺪﻧﺪﻣﺁ ﻦﻣ نﺪﻳد ﻪﺑ ﺮﻔﻧود ،مﺪﺷ بﺎﺨﻧا ﺮﺴﻣار و ( يﺪﻌﺑ ﻦﺑﺎﮑﻨﺗ ) راﻮﺴﻬﺷ ﻪﻴﺑﺎﺨﺘﻧا ﻩزﻮﺣ زا لوا ﺲﻠﺠﻣ تﺎﺑﺎﺨﺘﻧا رد ﻦﻣ ﻪﮐ ﻲﻧﺎﻣز .بﻼﻘﻧا زا ﺲﭘ ﻪﺑ ﺖﺳا طﻮﺑﺮﻣ ﺮﮕﻳد ﻩﺮﻃﺎﺧ
ﻩزﺎﺟا ﻲﻣﻼﺳا يرﻮﻬﻤﺟ مﺎﻈﻧ رد ﻪﮐ ﺪﻧدﻮﺑ ﻩدﺮﮐ ﺖﺳاﻮﺧ رد ،ﺮﺒﻣﺎﻴﭘ و مﻼﺳا ﻪﺑ ناواﺮﻓ ماﺮﺘﺣا يادا و ﮏﻳﺮﺒﺗ ﻦﻤﺿ نﺁ رد .مﺪﻧاﻮﺧ ار ﻦﺘﻣ .ﺪﻧا ﻩﺪﻣﺁ ﮏﻳﺮﺒﺗ ياﺮﺑ ﻪﮐ ﺪﻨﺘﻔﮔ و ﺪﻧداد ﻦﻣ ﻪﺑ ار ﻲﻨﺘﻣ و ﻩدﺮﮐ ﻲﻓﺮﻌﻣ
بﺎﻨﺘﺟا ﻲﺳﺎﻴﺳ رﺎﮐ زا ﻪﺸﻴﻤه نﺎﺷ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﻩﺪﻴﻘﻋ ﻖﺒﻃ نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﮐ دﻮﺑ ﻩﺪﺷ ﻩدوﺰﻓا ﻪﺘﺒﻟا .دﻮﺷ ﻩداد نﺎﻳﺎﭘ ﻲﻧﻻﻮﻃ ﺖﻴﻣوﺮﺤﻣ ﻦﻳا ﻪﺑ و ﺪﻧﻮﺷ رادرﻮﺧﺮﺑ يﺪﻧوﺮﻬﺷ و ﻲﻧﺪﻣ قﻮﻘﺣ زا ﺰﻴﻧ ناﺮﻳا نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﮐ دﻮﺷ ﻩداد
و ﺖﺳا ﻪﻤه ياﺮﺑ ﺖﻟاﺪﻋ و يدازﺁ ياﺮﺑ بﻼﻘﻧا ﻪﮐ ﻢﺘﻔﮔ ﺮﮑﺸﺗ ﻦﻤﺿ ﺰﻴﻧ ﻦﻣ .( ﻢﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ ﻞﻘﻧ ﺎﻧﻮﻤﻀﻣ مراﺪﻧ رﺎﻴﺘﺧا رد نﻮﻨﮐا ار ﻦﺘﻣ ﻪﮐﺎﺠﻧﺁ زا ) ﺪﻨﺷﺎﺑ ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ﺪﻨهاﻮﺧ ﻲﻣ و ﺪﻨﺸﻳﺪﻧا ﻲﻣ ناﺮﻳا ﻪﺑ ﻂﻘﻓ و ﺪﻨﻨﮐ¬ﻲﻣ
و ﺪﻴﺷﺎﺑ رﻮﺒﺻ ﺰﻴﻧ ﺎﻤﺷ ﻪﮐ مراد رﺎﻈﺘﻧا و دراد جﺎﻴﺘﺣا نﺎﻣز ﻪﺑ ﺎﻬﻧﺁ ﻊﻓر ﻪﮐ دراد دﻮﺟو ﻲﮕﻨهﺮﻓ ﻊﻧاﻮﻣ ﻪﻠﺴﻠﺳ ﮏﻳ ﺮﻴﺴﻣ ﻦﻳا رد ﻪﺘﺒﻟا مدوﺰﻓا ﺪﻌﺑ .ﺪﻧا ﻲﻧاﺮﻳا ﻢه ﺎه ﻲﻳﺎﻬﺑ و ﺪﻧﻮﺷ رادرﻮﺧﺮﺑ نﺁ زا ﻪﻤه ﻪﮐ مراوﺪﻴﻣا
.دﺮﮐ ﻢهاﻮﺧ عﺎﻓد ﺾﻴﻌﺒﺗ نوﺪﺑ مدﺮﻣ مﺎﻤﺗ قﻮﻘﺣ زا ناﻮﺗ ﺪﺣ رد ﺲﻠﺠﻣ ﻩﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻧ ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑ ﻦﻣ ﻪﻤه ﻦﻳا ﺎﺑ .ﺪﻴﻨﮑﻧ بﺎﺘﺷ نﺎﺘﻗﻮﻘﺣ يﺎﻔﻴﺘﺳا رد
و نﺎﻴﻳﺎﻬﺑ ﻪﺑ ﺪﺳر ﻪﭼ ﺎﺗ ﺖﺷاﺪﻧ دﻮﺟو ﻦﻣ لﺎﺜﻣا و ﻦﻣ ياﺮﺑ ﺰﻴﻧ ﺲﻠﺠﻣ نﺎﮔﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻧ ﻲﻧﻮﻧﺎﻗ و ﻲﻋﺮﺷ قﻮﻘﺣ زا عﺎﻓد نﺎﮑﻣا ﻪﮐ دﻮﺑ يا ﻪﻧﻮﮔ ﻪﺑ ثداﻮﺣ ﺮﻴﺳ ﻩﺎﺗﻮﮐ ﻲﺗﺪﻣ زا ﺲﭘ ﻢﺘﻓر ﺲﻠﺠﻣ ﻪﺑ ﻲﺘﻗو ﺎﻣا راﺰه و ﺎﻣا
زا ﺪﻧاﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻣ ﻪﻧﻮﮕﭼ ﺮﮕﻳد درﻮﺧ¬ﻲﻣ ﮏﺘﮐ ﺮﮕﻳد نﺎﮔﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻧ ﻪﻠﻴﺳﻮﺑ ﺲﻠﺠﻣ رد دﻮﺧ ﻖﻄﻧ ﺮﻃﺎﺧ ﻪﺑ ﺲﻠﺠﻣ ﻩﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻧ ﻲﺘﻗو .ﻢﻨﮐ عﺎﻓد ﻢﺘﺴﻧاﻮﺗ¬ﻲﻤﻧ مدﻮﺧ قﻮﻘﺣ زا مدﺮﻣ ﻩﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻧ ناﻮﻨﻋ ﻪﺑ ﻦﻣ ﺮﮕﻳد ترﺎﺒﻋ ﻪﺑ .ناﺮﮕﻳد
ﻪﻣﺎﻗا ﺮﺗﻻﺎﺑ ﺎﻳ و ﻲﺑﺎﺤﺳ ﺮﺘﮐد و نﺎﮔ رزﺎﺑ سﺪﻨﻬﻣ نﻮﭼ يرادﺮﮐ ﺖﺳار نﺎﻤﻠﺴﻣ و ﻲﺑﻼﻘﻧا ﺖﻟود ﻦﻴﻟوا ﺮﻳزو ﺖﺴﺨﻧ ياﺮﺑ دﻮﺑﺎﻳ ﻢﺳاﺮﻣ يراﺰﮔﺮﺑ ﻲﺘﺣ بﻼﻘﻧا زا لﺎﺳ 30 زا ﺲﭘ زوﺮﻣا ؟ﺪﻨﮐ عﺎﻓد ناﺮﮕﻳد قﻮﻘﺣ
.ﺖﺳا ﻦﺷور ناﺮﮕﻳد بﺎﺴﺣ .ﺖﺳا ﻪﺟاﻮﻣ ﻊﻨﻣ ﺎﺑ ﻪﻌﻤﺟ و نﺎﺑﺮﻗ و ﺮﻄﻓ زﺎﻤﻧ ﻲﺒهﺬﻣ ﺺﻟﺎﺧ ﻢﺳاﺮﻣ







Article printed from Iran Press Watch ﯽﺳرﺎﻓ: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa
URL to article: http://www.iranpresswatch.org/fa/post/267
URLs in this post:
[1] ﻦﻳﻻنﺁزور: http://www.roozonline.com/persian/opinion/opinion-article/article/2009/february/19/-d8b3caa109.html

Copyright © 2009 Iran Press Watch ﯽﺳرﺎﻓ. All rights reserved.
















3 of 3